views:

382

answers:

5

I have a very large collection of (p, q) tuples that I would like to convert into a dictionary of lists where the first item in each tuple is a key that indexes a list that contains q.

Example:

Original List: (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3)  
Resultant Dictionary: {1:[2, 3], 2:[3]}

Furthermore, I would like to efficiently combine these dictionaries.

Example:

Original Dictionaries: {1:[2, 3], 2:[3]}, {1:[4], 3:[1]}  
Resultant Dictionary: {1:[2, 3, 4], 2:[3], 3:[1]}

These operations reside within an inner loop, so I would prefer that they be as fast as possible.

Thanks in advance

+3  A: 

defaltdict to the rescue (as usual)

from collections import defaultdict
my_dict = defaultdict(list)

for key,value in original_list:
    my_dict[key].append(value)

Combining the two dicts can be done like this (note that duplicates will be preserved):

for key,value in orig_dict:
    new_dict[key].extend(value)
Triptych
I think you need to .append() items from the tuples.
Noah
your second loop is not operational
SilentGhost
+3  A: 

collections.defaultdict works like this:

from collections import defaultdict
dic = defaultdict(list)
for i, j in tuples:
    dic[i].append(j)

similar for the dicts:

a, b = {1:[2, 3], 2:[3]}, {1:[4], 3:[1]}
de = defaultdict(list, a)
for i, j in b.items():
    de[i].extend(j)
SilentGhost
A: 

Here is the iterator style of doing it

>>> mylist=[(1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3)]
>>> from itertools import groupby
>>> from operator import itemgetter
>>> mylist=[(1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3)]
>>> groupby(mylist,itemgetter(0))

>>> list(_)
[(1, <itertools._grouper object at 0xb7d402ec>), (2, <itertools._grouper object at 0xb7c716ec>)]
gnibbler
that's not what OP asked for, is it?
SilentGhost
+2  A: 

If the list of tuples is sorted, itertools.groupby, as suggested by @gnibbler, is not a bad alternative to defaultdict, but it needs to be used differently than he suggested:

import itertools
import operator

def lot_to_dict(lot):
  key = operator.itemgetter(0)
  # if lot's not sorted, you also need...:
  # lot = sorted(lot, key=key)
  # NOT in-place lot.sort to avoid changing it!
  grob = itertools.groupby(lot, key)
  return dict((k, [v[1] for v in itr]) for k, itr in grob)

For "merging" dicts of lists into a new d.o.l...:

def merge_dols(dol1, dol2):
  keys = set(dol1).union(dol2)
  no = []
  return dict((k, dol1.get(k, no) + dol2.get(k, no)) for k in keys)

I'm giving [] a nickname no to avoid uselessly constructing a lot of empty lists, given that performance is important. If the sets of the dols' keys overlap only modestly, faster would be:

def merge_dols(dol1, dol2):
  result = dict(dol1, **dol2)
  result.update((k, dol1[k] + dol2[k])
                for k in set(dol1).intersection(dol2))
  return result

since this uses list-catenation only for overlapping keys -- so, if those are few, it will be faster.

Alex Martelli
A: 

I wanted these done in one line just for fun:

>>> from itertools import groupby
>>> t=(1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 3) 
>>> [(i,[x for _,x in list(f)]) for i,f in groupby(sorted(t),lambda t: t[0])] 
[(1, [2, 3]), (2, [3])]
>>> b={1:[2, 3], 2:[3]}, {1:[4], 3:[1]}
>>> dict([(key,sum([i[1::][0] for i in elements],[])) for key,elements in groupby(sorted(b[0].items()+b[1].items()),lambda t: t[0])])
{1: [2, 3, 4], 2: [3], 3: [1]}
Kalmi