tags:

views:

488

answers:

12

Is there any difference between:

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="davyjones"

and

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username LIKE "davyjones"

(I think I've bungled up the syntax... pardon me for that,
I'm mostly a desktop app development guy)

+17  A: 

LIKE allows partial matching / use of wildcards, while = checks for exact matches.

For example

SELECT * FROM test WHERE field LIKE '%oom';

Will return rows where field value is any of the following:

Zoom, Boom, Loom, Groom
code_burgar
Thanks for the help -- SQL is really freaking me out -- it ... like ... some odd variant of broken english :O ... and why can't the SQL guys use the standard wildcards ... or maybe the standard regex ops...
Aviral Dasgupta
It won't return those rows if column is CHAR(5) instead of VARCHAR(5).
Milan Babuškov
@Milan: It will in MySQL
code_burgar
@codeburger: MySQL has years before it gets anywhere near being SQL standard compliant ;)
Milan Babuškov
A: 

LIKE supports wildcards. Usually it uses the % or _ character for the wildcard.

Using the LIKE operator with no wildcards is the same as using the = operator.

auujay
+2  A: 

That will give you the same result. However, LIKE allows wildcards, for example...

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username LIKE 'davy%'

The only syntax problem was double quotes instead of single quotes

Richard
+4  A: 

LIKE allows wildcards like % (any number of characters here) and _ (one character here).

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username LIKE 'joe%'

Selects all usernames starting with joe.

T.J. Crowder
+7  A: 

In that case, there is no difference that would come up in the results. However, it uses a different method for comparision, and the "LIKE" would be much slower.

Check out this for examples of LIKE : http://www.techonthenet.com/sql/like.php

In this case, you still want to use the equals.

Update: Note that there is a crucial difference when it comes to CHAR type columns in which the results will be different. See this answer for more details. When using VARCHAR (presumably the norm), the above are equivalent and equals is to be preferred.

Erich
Potentially in a stored procedure, however in testing in SQL Server through dynamic SQL, I've noticed it does not optimize this.I've also run a test on Oracle, and it doesn't seem to optimize Dynamic SQL.
Erich
I find it amazing how wrong answers often get accepted on SO. :(
Milan Babuškov
In what manner would you say that my answer is wrong? In this situation, LIKE and '=' have identical functionality. He really means '=', and thus should. I also pointed out a bit of documentation on how LIKE should be used...Pretty sure I answered the question as much as everyone else.
Erich
See my answer below, and read up on SQL specs. There is an important difference if you use CHAR columns.
Milan Babuškov
Ah, I knew of that difference, however I hadn't run into that in a while. I made the assumption he was using VARCHAR, since I (and my company) tend to use it any time the data doesn't have a fixed length.
Erich
A: 

Equals '=' is just for equality. On the other hand, LIKE supports SQL wildcard matching.

So, with LIKE you can do name like '%jones' to get all the names ending in jones. With LIKE, the percent '%' character is anything, length zero or more, and the underscore character, '_', is any one character.

jbourque
A: 

The LIKE condition allows you to use wildcards:

SELECT * FROM suppliers
WHERE supplier_name like 'Hew%';

See more examples.

and Equals = is used for equality matching.

Daniel May
+1  A: 

LIKE searches for a pattern.

/* Returns all users whose username starts with "d" */
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username LIKE 'd%'

/* Returns all users whose username contains "dav" */
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username LIKE '%dav%'
Larsenal
A: 

As far as I know, there is no difference but a time cost to the two selects you wrote. Usually one uses LIKE together with '%', meaning 'any string'. I think there's also a character that can be used with LIKE for 'any character', not sure what that is without googling.

But as your two selects go, the only difference I see is a different run time, since LIKE is used in a regexp-sort-of-fashion.

laura
+7  A: 

As per SQL standard, the difference is treatment of trailing whitespace in CHAR columns. Example:

create table t1 ( c10 char(10) );
insert into t1 values ('davyjones');

select * from t1 where c10 = 'davyjones';
-- yields 1 row

select * from t1 where c10 like 'davyjones';
-- yields 0 rows

Of course, assuming you run this on a standard-compliant DBMS. BTW, this is one the main differences between CHARs and VARCHARs.

Milan Babuškov
why would the second example yield 0 rows? These two statememts look equivalent to me given your test data
mjmarsh
because 'test' is stored as 'test' + 4 spaces. SQL standard says that LIKE should not match that, while = should. For VARCHAR columns there is no difference.
Milan Babuškov
Yet another reason for never using char data type unless you will always have that exact number of characters.
HLGEM
@HLGEM -- who needed another reason?
tvanfosson
A: 

Like gets you to work with wild card operators, you may use it in your case for like 'davyjon%' to get all the results starting with davyjon, and to get the exct you may place 'davyjones' and you may also use "=" in this case

SQL Like
A: 

Like is pattern matching operator and '=' is exact matching operator. i.e. where name like 'W%' it means start with 'W' and after that one or more characters and '=' i.e. where name ='James' this is exact matching

P Sharma