One of the feature I like in RoR is the db management, it can hide all the sql statement, also, it is very easy to change different db in RoR, is there any similar framework in Python 3000?
+4
A:
Python 3 is not yet in high deployment. It's still lacking a lot of third party libraries.
The recommended Python version is 2.6.x, as it's the most current, it's backwards compatible, and has many backported features from 3.1.
For Python 2.6 you will find quite a few frameworks:
voyager
2009-10-02 15:20:56
it is 2.6.3 as of yesterday
SilentGhost
2009-10-02 16:39:20
Damn! Thanks SilentGhost *rushes to http://www.python.org/download/releases/*
voyager
2009-10-02 16:47:50
no windows version yet.
SilentGhost
2009-10-02 16:50:12
Actually, I use Arch Linux and it seems that it hasen't been updated, *yet* http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/python/
voyager
2009-10-02 17:04:22
A:
Python 3 is not ready for practical use, because there is not yet enough libraries that have been updated to support Python 3. So the answer is: No.
But there are LOADS of them on Python 2. Tens, at least.
Django, Turbogears, BFG and of course the old man of the game: Zope. To tell which is best for you, you need to expand your requirements a lot.
Lennart Regebro
2009-10-02 15:21:04
Here is a (probably not complete) list:http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks
Lennart Regebro
2009-10-02 16:05:32
+1
A:
Python 3 isn't ready for web applications right now. The WSGI 1.0 specification isn't suitable for Py3k and the related standard libraries are 2to3 hacks that don't work consistently faced with bytes vs. unicode. It's a real mess.
WEB-SIG are bashing out proposals for a WSGI revision; hopefully it can move forward soon, because although Python 3 isn't mainstream yet it's certainly heading that way, and the brokenness of webdev is rather embarrassing.
bobince
2009-10-02 16:08:15
+2
A:
I believe CherryPy is on the verge of being released for Python 3.X.
Graham Dumpleton
2009-10-02 23:11:49