You can't without going to great lengths to duplicate the functionality of the debugger, dtrace, and/or the various other tools that do exactly this kind of thing. It is remarkably architecture dependent and rife with special cases and situations that flat out don't work.
You certainly would never want to do such a thing in production code. For debugging, there are enough tools that do this in enough contexts that there is no need to do so.
What are you trying to do?
Basically i'm using KVO and if the KVO
method is triggered from another
method which is an IBAction I don't
what it to do what it would normally
do otherwise it would go into a loop
(related to my earlier question).
Down this path lies madness. It totally breaks encapsulation to have a method whose execution is impacted by a caller without their being some kind of explicit argument or implicit configuration indicating that the behavior should change.
If you are ending up in an infinite loop, then I would suggest revisiting your overall architecture.
In particular, when a KVO notification fires, it should almost never trigger a KVO notification of the same property either directly or indirectly. In the exceedingly rare case where this is unavoidable, you should make sure you do the KVO triggers by hand using -willChangeValueForKey:
and -didChangeValueForKey:
conditionally.
Basically, just to explain, I am
observing a core data property and the
method that gets called when the
property changes calls another method
(the IBAction) but in this IBAction it
adds Core Data objects which triggers
the KVO method which triggers the
IBAction and so forth. That is why I
was trying to figure out where the
method was called from so I could stop
this infinite loop
In other words, you have a model layer change that is then calling a method at the interface between view layer and control layer (the IBAction method) that then, not surprisingly, triggers another model level change which then goes off the rails....
Once your observer fires and you need to make a change in the model as a result, you should keep all of the change logic within the model layer. It is your model, after all, and it should have the smarts to apply changes appropriately.
What should never happen is that the control layer or view layer triggers changes to the model in response to the model changing. Changes to the model -- to the data -- from the control/view layer should only ever occur in response to user action or some external event (a timer, perchance).