I have a lot of XSL files in my ASP.NET web app. A lot. I generate a bunch of AJAX HTML responses using this kind of generic transform method:
public void Transform(XmlDocument xml, string xslPath)
{
...
XslTransform myXslTrans = new XslTransform();
myXslTrans.Load(xslPath);
myXslTrans.Transform(xml,null, HttpContext.Current.Response.Output);
}
I'd like to move the XSL definitions into SQL Server, using a column of type xml. I would store an entire XSL file in a single row in SQL, and each XSL is self-contained (no imports). I would read out the XSL definition from SQL into my XslTransform object.
Something like this:
public void Transform(XmlDocument xml, string xslKey)
{
...
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("GetXslDefinition");
cmd.AddParameter("@xslKey", SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = xslKey;
// where the result set has a single column of XSL: "<xslt:stylesheet>..."
...
SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader();
if(dr.Read()) {
SqlXml xsl = dr.GetSqlXml(0);
XslTransform myXslTrans = new XslTransform();
myXslTrans.Load(xsl.CreateReader());
myXslTrans.Transform(xml,null, HttpContext.Current.Response.Output);
}
}
It seems like a straightforward way to:
- add metadata to each XSL, like lastUsed, useCount, etc.
- bulk update/search capabilities
- prevent lots of disk access
- avoid referencing relative paths and organizing files
- allow XSL changes without redeploying (I could even write an admin page that selects/updates the XSL in the database)
Has anyone tried this before? Are there any caveats?
EDIT
Caveats that responders have listed:
- disk access isn't guaranteed to diminish
- this will break xsl:includes