views:

435

answers:

5

I'm reading about an algorithm (it's a path-finding algorithm based on A*), and it contains a mathematical symbol I'm unfamiliar with: ∀

Here is the context:

v(s) >= g(s) = min[s'∈pred(s)](v(s') + c(s', s)) ∀s != s[start]

Note: items in [brackets] are supposed to be subscript

Can someone explain the meaning of ∀?

+15  A: 

That's the "forall" (for all) symbol, as seen in Wikipedia's table of mathematical symbols or the Unicode forall character (\u2200, ∀).

Mark Rushakoff
That would make sense: "...for all s unequal to s[start]"
DanM
Thanks and +1 for the link to the table of symbols. I will use that next time I'm stumped (searching Google for ∀ turned up no records).
DanM
lol, I had never thought about googling for symbols. And apparently I didn't lose anything.
Martinho Fernandes
+7  A: 

In math, ∀ means FOR ALL.

Unicode character (\u2200, ∀).

Yada
They call it the "Universal Qualifier". Compare with the "Existential Qualifier". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
S.Lott
@S.Lott: nitpick s/qualifier/quantifier
Martinho Fernandes
+4  A: 

Can be read, "For all s such that s does not equal s[start]"

ty
+12  A: 

The upside-down A symbol is the universal quantifier from predicate logic. (Also see the more complete discussion of the first-order predicate calculus.) As others noted, it means that the stated assertions holds "for all instances" of the given variable (here, s). You'll soon run into its sibling, the backwards capital E, which is the existential quantifier, meaning "there exists at least one" of the given variable conforming to the related assertion.

If you're interested in logic, you might enjoy the book Logic and Databases: The Roots of Relational Theory by C.J. Date. There are several chapters covering these quantifiers and their logical implications. You don't have to be working with databases to benefit from this book's coverage of logic.

seh
+1 for mentioning ∃ (U+2203 THERE EXISTS). Actually ∀ and ∃ are used in predicate calculus in general, be it first-order or higher-order. For a second-order example, in the induction axiom of Peano arithmetic you quantify over predicates and write ∀P.
starblue
Thanks for pointing that out. I revised the reference per your suggestion.
seh
A: 

yes, these are the well-known quantifiers used in math. Another example is ∃ which reads as "exists".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification

D_K