C++ Variant

Question

I'm in the process of creating a class that stores metadata about a particular data source. The metadata is structured in a tree, very similar to how XML is structured. The metadata values can be integer, decimal, or string values.

I'm curious if there is a good way in C++ to store variant data for a situation like this. I'd like for the variant to use standard libraries, so I'm avoiding the COM, Ole, and SQL VARIANT types that are available.

My current solution looks something like this:

enum MetaValueType
{
    MetaChar,
    MetaString,
    MetaShort,
    MetaInt,
    MetaFloat,
    MetaDouble
};

union MetaUnion
{
    char cValue;
    short sValue;
    int iValue;
    float fValue;
    double dValue;
};

class MetaValue
{
...
private:
    MetaValueType ValueType;
    std::string StringValue;
    MetaUnion VariantValue;
};

The MetaValue class has various Get functions for obtaining the currently stored variant value, but it ends up making every query for a value a big block of if/else if statements to figure out which value I'm looking for.

I've also explored storing the value as only a string, and performing conversions to get different variant types out, but as far as I've seen this leads to a bunch of internal string parsing and error handling which isn't pretty, opens up a big old can of precision and data loss issues with floating point values, and still doesn't eliminate the query if/else if issue stated above.

Has anybody implemented or seen something that's cleaner to use for a C++ variant data type using standard libraries?

Answer 1

You might want Boost.Variant or Boost.Any.

Just as an additional pointer, you can look for “type erasure”.

Answer 2

You can also go down to a more C-ish solution, which would have a void* the size of a double on your system, plus an enum for which type you're using. It's reasonably clean, but definitely a solution for someone who feels wholly comfortable with the raw bytes of the system.

Answer 3

While Konrad's answer (using an existing standardized solution) is certainly preferable to writing your own bug-prone version, the boost variant has some overheads, especially in copy construction and memory.

A common customized approach is the following modified Factory Pattern:

1. Create a Base interface for a generic object that also encapsulates the object type (either as an enum), or using 'typeid' (preferable).
2. Now implement the interface using a template 'Derived' class.
3. Create a factory class with a templateized 'create' function with signature:

template Base * Factory::create (); // This internally creates a Derived<_T> object on the heap, and retuns a dynamic cast pointer. Specialize this for each class you want implemented.

Finally, define a 'Variant' wrapper that contains this Base * pointer and defines template get and set functions. Utility functions like getType(), isEmpty(), assignment and equality operators, etc can be appropriately implemented here.

Depending on the utility functions and the factory implementation, supported classes will need to support some basic functions like assignment or copy construction.