I'd like to do this in a platform independant way, and I know libpng is a possibility, but I find it hard to figure out how. Does anyone know how to do this in a simple way?
+1
A:
You can use Imagemagick but it does several other things as well.
Amit Kumar
2010-02-18 10:37:29
+1
A:
I'd say libpng is still the easiest way. There's example read -> process -> write png program, it is fairly simple once you strip the error handling (setjmp/longjmp/png_jmpbuf) stuff. It doesn't get simpler than that.
sbk
2010-02-18 11:47:57
Yes, I saw that. I must say, I was confused, but now that you TELL me that it's simple, it really is ;)
henle
2010-02-18 14:00:24
+2
A:
There is a C++ wrapper for libpng
called Png++
. Check it here or just google it.
They have a real C++ interface with templates and such that uses libpng
under the hood. I've found the code I have written quite expressive and high-level.
Example of "generator" which is the heart of the algorithm:
class PngGenerator : public png::generator< png::gray_pixel_1, PngGenerator>
{
typedef png::generator< png::gray_pixel_1, PngGenerator> base_t;
public:
typedef std::vector<char> line_t;
typedef std::vector<line_t> picture_t;
PngGenerator(const picture_t& iPicture) :
base_t(iPicture.front().size(), iPicture.size()),
_picture(iPicture), _row(iPicture.front().size())
{
} // PngGenerator
png::byte* get_next_row(size_t pos)
{
const line_t& aLine = _picture[pos];
for(size_t i(0), max(aLine.size()); i < max; ++i)
_row[i] = pixel_t(aLine[i] == Png::White_256);
// Pixel value can be either 0 or 1
// 0: Black, 1: White
return row_traits::get_data(_row);
} // get_next_row
private:
// To be transformed
const picture_t& _picture;
// Into
typedef png::gray_pixel_1 pixel_t;
typedef png::packed_pixel_row< pixel_t > row_t;
typedef png::row_traits< row_t > row_traits;
row_t _row; // Buffer
}; // class PngGenerator
And usage is like this:
std::ostream& Png::write(std::ostream& out)
{
PngGenerator aPng(_picture);
aPng.write(out);
return out;
}
There were some bits still missing from libpng
(interleaving options and such), but frankly I did not use them so it was okay for me.
Matthieu M.
2010-02-18 15:17:04