tags:

views:

364

answers:

3

A there any g++ options which can detect improper initialization of std::string with NULL const char*?

I was in the process of turning some int fields into std::string ones, i.e:

struct Foo
{
   int id;
   Foo() : id(0) {} 
};

...turned into:

struct Foo
{
   std::string id;
   Foo() : id(0) {} //oooops!
};

I completely overlooked bad 'id' initialization with 0 and g++ gave me no warnings at all. This error was detected in the run time(std::string constructor threw an exception) but I'd really like to detect such stuff in the compile time. Is there any way?

+3  A: 

I think it is actually undefined behavior and not checked by the compiler. You are lucky that this implementation throws an exception.

However, you can avoid such problems by specifying that you want default or zero-initialization in a type-agnostic way:

struct Foo
{
   X id;
   Foo() : id() {} //note empty parenthesis
};
visitor
Hm...so you are saying default constructor for int type assigns 0 ?
pachanga
This syntax means zero-initialization for built-in types.
visitor
Thanks for the info!
pachanga
A: 

There is infrastructure in GCC to produce exactly this sort of warning:

void foo(const char* cstr) __attribute__((nonnull (1)));

void bar() {
    foo(0);
}

when compiled with -Wnonnull (which is implied by -Wall) produces:

warning: null argument where non-null required (argument 1)

So in principle you ought to be able to modify the relevant system header (or, better for experimenting, modify your own $HOME/bits/basic_string.h copy and then override the system one with -isystem $HOME) similarly:

basic_string(const _CharT* __s, const _Alloc& __a = _Alloc())
    __attribute__((nonnull (1)));

However this doesn't help because (at least in 4.0.1) -Wnonnull is not supported in C++ and the attribute is apparently ignored. It's not obvious why this is so; perhaps it was felt that it interacted badly with overloading or something.

John Marshall
+1  A: 

I can't think of a way to detect this at compile-time, so I wrote a string builder function that properly deals with null pointers:

//  FUNCTION :      safe_string(char const* pszS)
//  PARAMATERS :    pszS        source string to build a string from (may be NULL or 0-length)
//  DESCRIPTION :   Safely builds a string object from a char*, even a NULL pointer
//  RETURNS :       string

template<class C>
inline basic_string<C> safe_string(const C* input)
{
    if( !input )
        return basic_string<C>();
    return basic_string<C>(input);
}

I use this whenever I create a string and there's a chance the input might be NULL.

John Dibling