C++ How do you set an array of pointers to null in an initialiser list like way?

Question

I am aware you cannot use an initialiser list for an array. However I have heard of ways that you can set an array of pointers to NULL in a way that is similar to an initialiser list.

I am not certain how this is done. I have heard that a pointer is set to NULL by default, though I do not know if this is guaranteed/ in the C++ standard. I am also not sure if initialising through the new operator compared to normal allocation can make a difference too.

Edit: I mean to do this in a header file/constructor initialisation list. I do not want to put it in the constructor, and I do not want to use a Vector.

Answer 1

int foo1[42] = { 0 }; // init array of int to all zeroes

char * foo2 = NULL; // init pointer to NULL

float * foo3[42] = { NULL }; // init array of pointers to NULL

Answer 2

void* p[10] = { 0 };

Answer 3

I am not certain how this is done. I have heard that a pointer is set to NULL by default, though I do not know if this is guaranteed/ in the C++ standard.
It is not guaranteed by the C++ standard. Built in types ( like pointers ) are filled with garbage unless set otherwise.

I am also not sure if initialising through the new operator compared to normal allocation can make a difference too.
What do you mean by "normal allocation" ? If you're talking about an automatic variable, then you can do this:

MyType * pointers[2] = {NULL}

and the pointers should be initialized to NULL.

Answer 4

You can switch from array to std::vector and use

std::vector<T*> v(SIZE);

The values will be initialized by NULLs automatically. This is the preferred C++ way.

Answer 5

If you have a member array then there is no way to initialize, unless it's a static member. If the array isn't a static member then you'll have to fill it inside the constructor's body.

That said, chances are you're really better off using a std::vector. Other than for technical reasons such as unavailability of a standard STL for your platform, or the slightly lesser performance a std::vector is better than an array by any and all criteria. If performance is the issue then make sure you profiled and know by numbers that it is an issue.

Answer 6

In order to set an array of pointers to nulls in constructor initializer list, you can use the () initializer

struct S {
  int *a[100];

  S() : a() {
    // `a` contains null pointers 
  }
};

Unfortunately, in the current version of the language the () initializer is the only initializer that you can use with an array member in the constructor initializer list. But apparently this is what you need in your case.

The () has the same effect on arrays allocated with new[]

int *a = new int[100]();
// `a[i]` contain null pointers 

In other contexts you can use the {} aggregate initializer to achieve the same effect

int *a[100] = {};
// `a` contains null pointers 

Note that there's absolutely no need to squeeze a 0 or a NULL between the {}. The empty pair of {} will do just fine.