According to git's Object Model if you only change the meta-data of a commit (i.e. commit message) but not the underlying data ("tree(s)") contained within it then it's Tree hash will remain unchanged.
Aside from editing a commit message, you are also performing a rebase, which will change the Tree hashes of each commit in your history, because any changes pulled from origin/master
will affect the files in your re-written history: which means some of the files (blobs) that your commit points to have changed.
So there is no bullet-proof way to do what you want.
That said, editing a commit with rebase -i
does not usually alter the commit's timestamp and author, so you could use this to uniquely identify your commits before and after a rebase operation.
You would have to write a script which records all the branch start-points against these "timestamp:author" identifier before doing a rebase, and then find the rewritten commits with the same "timestamp:author" ID and rebase the branch on it.
Sadly, I don't have time to try writing this script myself now, so I can only wish you the best of luck!
Edit: You can obtain the author email address and timestamp using:
$ git log --graph --all --pretty=format:"%h %ae:%ci"
* 53ca31a [email protected]:2010-06-16 13:50:12 +0100
* 03dda75 [email protected]:2010-06-16 13:50:11 +0100
| * a8bb03a [email protected]:2010-06-16 13:49:46 +0100
| * b93e59d [email protected]:2010-06-16 13:49:44 +0100
|/
* d4214a2 [email protected]:2010-06-16 13:49:41 +0100
And you can obtain a list of branches for each of these based on their commit hash:
$ git branch --contains 03dda75
* testbranch
Watch out for multiple branches per commit, the common ancestor d4214a2
belongs to both branches!