Referring to a previous question, i was wondering if its always possible to replace DECODE by CASE and which one is better for performance?
+10
A:
As always with Oracle ... AskTom...
From this post...
Decode is somewhat obscure -- CASE is very very clear. Things that are easy to do in decode are easy to do in CASE, things that are hard or near impossible to do with decode are easy to do in CASE. CASE, logic wise, wins hands down.
From a performance point of view seems they are about the same, again above article mentions some speed differences but without benchmarking the particular statements it's hard to say.
Andy Robinson
2010-07-07 10:03:17
Another point from the same article: "decode is the function Oracle originally provided with releases of the database prior to 8.1.6. Starting with 816, CASE is the standard way to achieve the same results"- So when using older versions of Oracle, CASE may not be availablle.
Mark Bannister
2010-07-07 10:11:51
8.1.6 is very old, I think 8.1.6 dates from 1999.
TTT
2010-07-07 13:42:50
+2
A:
There is one big difference between DECODE
and CASE
and it has to do with how NULLs
are compared. DECODE
will return "true" if you compare NULL
to NULL
. CASE
will not. For example:
DECODE(NULL, NULL, 1, 0)
will return '1'.
CASE NULL
WHEN NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
will return '0'. You would have to write it as:
CASE
WHEN NULL IS NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
Cheran S
2010-07-09 05:00:03