views:

196

answers:

1

What's wrong here?

#include <memory>
#include <vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<std::unique_ptr<int>> vec;

    int x(1);
    std::unique_ptr<int> ptr2x(&x);
    vec.push_back(ptr2x); //This tiny command has a vicious error.

    return 0;
}

The error:

$ g++ -std=gnu++0x main.cpp
In file included from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/mingw32/bits/c++allocator.h:34:0,
                 from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/bits/allocator.h:48,
                 from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/memory:64,
                 from main.cpp:6:
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h: I
n member function 'void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<_Tp>::construct(_Tp*,
 const _Tp&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Tp* = std::unique_ptr<
int>*]':
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:74
5:6:   instantiated from 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(con
st value_type&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::alloca
tor<std::unique_ptr<int> >, value_type = std::unique_ptr<int>]'
main.cpp:16:21:   instantiated from here
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h:20
7:7: error: deleted function 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>::uniqu
e_ptr(const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>&) [with _Tp = int, _Tp_D
eleter = std::default_delete<int>, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter> =
 std::unique_ptr<int>]'
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/ext/new_allocator.h:
105:9: error: used here
In file included from c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c+
+/vector:69:0,
                 from main.cpp:7:
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h: I
n member function 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_M_insert_aux(std::v
ector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, _Args&& ...) [with _Args = {const std::u
nique_ptr<int>&}, _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<
std::unique_ptr<int> >, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx
::__normal_iterator<std::unique_ptr<int>*, std::vector<std::unique_ptr
<int> > >, typename std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Base::_Tp_alloc_type::p
ointer = std::unique_ptr<int>*]':
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h:74
9:4:   instantiated from 'void std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(con
st value_type&) [with _Tp = std::unique_ptr<int>, _Alloc = std::alloca
tor<std::unique_ptr<int> >, value_type = std::unique_ptr<int>]'
main.cpp:16:21:   instantiated from here
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/unique_ptr.h:20
7:7: error: deleted function 'std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>::uniqu
e_ptr(const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter>&) [with _Tp = int, _Tp_D
eleter = std::default_delete<int>, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Tp_Deleter> =
 std::unique_ptr<int>]'
c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.5.0/include/c++/bits/vector.tcc:314:
4: error: used here
+9  A: 

You need to move the unique_ptr:

vec.push_back(std::move(ptr2x));

unique_ptr guarantees that a single unique_ptr container has ownership of the held pointer. This means that you can't make copies of a unique_ptr (because then two unique_ptrs would have ownership), so you can only move it.

Note, however, that this is incorrect use of unique_ptr. You cannot use it to manage a pointer to a local variable. The lifetime of a local variable is managed automatically: local variables are destroyed when the block ends (e.g., when the function returns, in this case). You need to dynamically allocate the object:

std::unique_ptr<int> ptr(new int(1));
James McNellis
Since there can be only one, one should also be able to pass a temporary directly to the vector: `vec.push_back(std::unique_ptr<int>(new int(1)));`. `unique_ptr` can also use a custom deleter (which does nothing), but then one must take into account that the address of the local variable becomes invalid at the end of the scope.
UncleBens
Another option is to use `emplace_back`. e.g. `vec.emplace_back(new int(1));`
caspin