Hello!
I wonder about something. I'm sitting here with a solution there I have 1 superclass that has 2 subclasses and I'm currently mapping this using JoinedSubClass, but I get that this method is obsolete, and says that I should ClassMap and SubClassMap, but if I do this the AutoMapping does not work, and I don't want that. Is there any workaround for this?
Here's the hierarchy:
public class Tag : Entity
{
public virtual string Name {get;set;}
public virtual User User {get;set;}
}
public class RespondentTag : Tag
{
public virtual IList<Respondent> Respondents {get;set;}
}
public class ArchiveTag : Tag
{
public virtual IList<Survey> Surveys {get;set;}
}
As you probably figured out I want this to be a table per hierarchy-mapping with subclasses with lists that are Many-To-Many. Like a table 'Tag', then Tag_Respondent and Tag_Archive (for many-to-many relationship).
Here's the mapping that I'm currently using:
public class TagMap : IAutoMappingOverride<Tag>
{
public void Override(AutoMapping<Tag> mapping)
{
//This is obsolete
mapping.JoinedSubClass("RespondentTagId", RespondentTagMap.AsJoinedSubClass());
mapping.JoinedSubClass("ArchiveTagId", ArchiveTagMap.AsJoinedSubClass());
}
}
public class RespondentTagMap
{
public static Action<JoinedSubClassPart<RespondentTag>> AsJoinedSubClass()
{
return part =>
part.HasManyToMany(x => x.RespondentList)
.Cascade
.SaveUpdate()
.Inverse()
.Table("Tag_Respondent");
}
}
public class ArchiveTagMap
{
public static Action<JoinedSubClassPart<ArchiveTag>> AsJoinedSubClass()
{
return part =>
part.HasManyToMany(x => x.Surveys)
.Cascade
.SaveUpdate()
.Inverse()
.Table("Tag_Archive");
}
}
Does anyone know about a workaround or another solution for solving this? (Without disabling automapping)
Any answers will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!