Is there any way to use the += operator with a vector without using boost or using a derivated class?
Eg.
somevector += 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7;
would actually be
somevector.push_back(1);
somevector.push_back(2);
somevector.push_back(3);
etc.
Is there any way to use the += operator with a vector without using boost or using a derivated class?
Eg.
somevector += 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7;
would actually be
somevector.push_back(1);
somevector.push_back(2);
somevector.push_back(3);
etc.
Not with syntax like that, no. But you could do something like this:
int tmparray[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
somevector.insert(somevector.end(), &tmparray, &tmparray + sizeof(tmparray));
With a little ugly operator overloading, this isn't too difficult to accomplish. This solution could easily be made more generic, but it should serve as an adequate example.
#include <vector>
Your desired syntax uses two operators: the +=
operator and the ,
operator. First, we need to create a wrapper class that allows us to apply the ,
operator to push an element onto the back of a vector:
template <typename T>
struct push_back_wrapper
{
explicit push_back_wrapper(std::vector<T>& v) : v_(&v) { }
push_back_wrapper& operator,(const T& x)
{
v_->push_back(x);
return *this;
}
std::vector<T>* v_;
};
Then, in order to use this in conjunction with +=
on a vector, we overload the +=
operator for a vector. We return a push_back_wrapper
instance so that we can chain push backs with the comma operator:
template <typename T, typename U>
push_back_wrapper<T> operator+=(std::vector<T>& v, const U& x)
{
v.push_back(x);
return push_back_wrapper<T>(v);
}
Now we can write the code you have in your example:
int main()
{
std::vector<int> v;
v += 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7;
}
The v += 1
will call our operator+=
overload, which will return an instance of the push_back_wrapper
. The comma operator is then applied for each of the subsequent elements in the "list."