Which is better for creating a settings file for Python programs, the built-in module (ConfigParser) or the independent project (ConfigObj), or using the YAML data serialization format? I have heard that ConfigObj is easier to use than ConfigParser, even though it is not a built-in library. I have also read that PyYAML is easy to use, though YAML takes a bit of time to use. Ease of implementation aside, which is the best option for creating a settings/configuration file?
A:
ConfigParser has a really bad API, ConfigObj is supposed to be good but I have never used it, for ini files I usually implement my own parser.
However ini-like formats don't handle different types, sequences or recursive mappings well anyway so I would just use yaml. It's easy to read and edit with an editor, there is a standard for parsing those files and you have none of the mentioned downsides ini-like formats have.
DasIch
2010-08-09 22:28:15
ConfigObj handles types and sequences fine :-)
fuzzyman
2010-08-12 00:15:34
+1
A:
Using ConfigObj is at least very straightforward and ini files in general are much simpler (and more widely used) than YAML. For more complex cases, including validation, default values and types, ConfigObj provides a way to do this through configspec validation.
Simple code to read an ini file with ConfigObj:
from configobj import ConfigObj
conf = ConfigObj('filename.ini')
section = conf['section']
value = section['value']
It automatically handles list values for you and allows multiline values. If you modify the config file you can write it back out whilst preserving order and comments.
See these articles for more info, including examples of the type validation:
fuzzyman
2010-08-12 00:19:56