I was looking at std::numeric_limits<float>::min/max()
but it appears 'min()' returns the smallest absolute value, not the lowest value. Is it safe to use
-std::numeric_limits<float>::max()
, i.e is float symmetric in min/max limits?
I was looking at std::numeric_limits<float>::min/max()
but it appears 'min()' returns the smallest absolute value, not the lowest value. Is it safe to use
-std::numeric_limits<float>::max()
, i.e is float symmetric in min/max limits?
use std::numeric_limits::lowest()
static _Ty __CRTDECL lowest() _THROW0()
{ // return most negative value
return (-(max)());
}
IEEE 754 floating point numbers use a sign bit for signed-ness (rather than something like twos complement), so if you're sure that your compiler/platform uses that representation (very common) then you can use -std::numeric_limits<float>::max()
as you suspected.
Yes, float
is symmetric in minimum/maximum values.
If you're using the lowest representable value as an initial value in searching a list for its maximum value, consider using infinity instead.
std::numeric_limits<T>::has_infinity()
will return true
for any numeric type that has it and std::numeric_limits<T>::infinity()
will return a value that always evaluates greater than any other non-NaN value for that type. This value can be negated and will evaluate less than anything else.