_Bool and bool: How do I solve the problem of a C library that uses _Bool?

Question

I've written a collection of data structures and functions in C, some of which use the _Bool data type. When I began, the project was going to be pure C. Now I am investigating using a C++ based GUI tool kit and have made the backend code into a library.

However, when compiling the C++ GUI the following error is emitted by the compiler:

ISO C++ forbids declaration of '_Bool' with no type

I initially thought I could search & replace _Bool to bool and create:

/* mybool.h */
#ifndef MYBOOL_H
#define MYBOOL_H

typedef _Bool bool;

#endif /* MYBOOL_H */

and then in any headers that use _Bool

#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#else
#include "mybool.h"
#endif

/* rest of header... */

Until I realized this would be compiling the library with one boolean (C _Bool) data type, and linking against the library using another (C++ bool). Practically, this might not matter, but theoretically, it probably does (there might be some obscure system somewhere which doing so like this causes the universe to turn inside out).

I suppose I could just use an int and use 0 for false and 1 for true, and typedef it with something like typedef int mybool, but it seems unattractive.

Is there a better/idiomatic/standard way to do this?

Answer 1

use typedef int _Bool for both your C and C++ code. I will be surprised if _Bool is defined as anything else.

Answer 2

Dumbass! Just #include <stdbool.h> and use bool.

Answer 3

If the C and C++ compilers you are using are from the same vendor then I would expect the C _Bool to be the same type as C++ bool, and that including <stdbool.h> would make everything nicely interoperable. If they are from different vendors then you'll need to check for compatibility.

Note, you can always test the __cplusplus macro in your header to determine whether or not the code is being compiled as C++, and set the types appropriately.