can scoped_ptr and shared_ptr be mixed?

Question

Hi!

Imagine I create an instance of Foo on the heap in a method/function and pass it to the caller. What kind of smartpointer would I use?

smartptr new_foo() {
    smartptr foo = new Foo();
    return foo;
}

void bar() {
    smartptr foo = new_foo();
    foo->do_something();
    // now autodelete foo, don't need it anymore
}

Ok... now: As far as I understand those smartpointers from boost, scoped_ptr should be the one to be used in bar(). But I can't create it in foo(), as it's not copyable. So I have to create a shared_ptr in foo() and return it. But do I now have to use a shared_ptr in bar(), or can I just "cast" it to an shared_ptr in bar()?

Edit

Thanks for your answers so far! So now I got two solutions:

• Use only boost::shared_ptr
• Use std::auto_ptr in the generator foo() and boost::shared_ptr in bar()

Sincerely, I prefer a boost-only solution and won't mix it with STL except there is really a good reason for doing so. So, next question: has the mixed solution any advantage over the boost only solution?

Answer 1

boost docs suggest they don't mix

If you are transfering ownership then another option at the moment would be auto_ptr e.g.

smartptr new_foo() { 
    std::auto_ptr<Foo> foo = new Foo(); 
    return foo; 
} 

void bar() { 
    std::auto_ptr<Foo> foo = new_foo(); 
    foo->do_something(); 
    // now autodelete foo, don't need it anymore 
} 

however this will then restrict how you can use new_foo() i.e. you can't use it to fill a container (without managing the resource some other way). :(

With C++0x and rvalue references this will be a job for unique_ptr, which will replace auto_ptr and just do what you want

Answer 2

Use boost::shared_ptr