tags:

views:

23

answers:

0
Q: 

Code Coverage when using NUnit to test unmanaged C++

My team is currently using CppUnit for all our unmanaged C++ unit tests but I'm toying with the idea of transitioning to NUnit through either GenTestAsm (pure C#) or C++/CLI. Either way, what consequences would I face on the Code Coverage front with either of these approaches?

We currently use PureCoverage to instrument our unmanaged unit test executables for collecting coverage data. Would we still be able to do this or is there another tool? Or would we lose code coverage visibility all together?

related questions

Of Memory Management, Heap Corruption, and C++
How do I make a GUI?
Alpha blending sprites in Nintendo DS Homebrew
Thread safe lazy contruction of a singleton in C++
Interview Programming Questions - In house Exam
Link issues (VC6)
What are the barriers to understanding pointers and what can be done to overcome them?
Why are professors or schools picking Java over C++ to teach to students?
What is the best way to create a sparse array in C++
C/C++ library for reading MIDI signals from a USB MIDI device
How do you pack a visual studio c++ project for release?
How to set up unit testing for Visual Studio C++
How do I configure and communicate with a serial port?
Lightweight IDE for Linux
Mapping Stream data to data structures in C#
CPU throttling in C++
Asynchronous multi-direction server-client communication over the same open socket?
Exceptions in C++
Heap corruption under Win32; how to locate?
Build for Windows NT 4.0 using Visual Studio 2005?
C++: Should I use nested classes in this case?
BerkeleyDB Concurrency
GTK implementation of MessageBox
Is gettimeofday() guaranteed to be of microsecond resolution?
How to use the C socket API in C++ on z/OS