I am attempting to leverage C++0x closures to make the control flow between a custom lexer and parser more straightforward. Without closures, I have the following arrangement:
//--------
// lexer.h
class Lexer {
public:
struct Token { int type; QString lexeme; }
struct Callback {
virtual int processToken(const Token &token) = 0;
};
Lexer();
int tokenize(const QList<Token> &patterns, QTextStream &stream,
Callback *callback);
};
//-------------
// foo_parser.h
class FooParser: public Lexer::Callback {
virtual int processToken(const Lexer::Token &token);
int process(QTextStream *fooStream);
// etc..
}
//--------------
// foo_parser.cc
int FooParser::processToken(const Lexer::Token &token) {
canonicalize(token);
processLine();
return 0;
}
int FooParser::process(QTextStream *fooStream) {
Lexer lexer;
// *** Jumps to FooParser::processToken() above! ***
return lexer.tokenize(patterns_, fooStream, this);
}
The main issue I have with the above code is that I don't like the "jump" in control flow from the lexer.tokenize() call to the FooParser::processToken() function.
I am hoping that closures will allow something like this:
int FooParser::process(QTextStream *fooStream) {
Lexer lexer;
return lexer.tokenize(patterns_, fooStream, [&](const Lexer::Token &token) {
canonicalize(token);
processLine();
return 0;
});
// ...
}
At least to me, it's a lot more clear what FooParser methods will be invoked via lexer.tokenize() .
Unfortunately the only examples I have seen with C++0x closures go something like this:
int total = 0;
std::for_each(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&total](int x){total += x;});
printf("total = %d\n", total);
And while I can get this example code to work, I have been unable to figure out how to write a function like std::for_each() that takes a Functor/closure as an argument and invokes it.
That is to say, I'm not sure how to write a class Foo such that I can do this:
// Does this need to be templated for the Functor?
struct Foo {
void doStuff( ... what goes here?????? ) {
myArg();
}
};
int someNumber = 1234;
Foo foo;
foo.doStuff([&]() { printf("someNumber = %d\n", someNumber); }
For this example, the expected output would be someNumber = 1234
For reference, my compiler is gcc version 4.5.1 .
Many thanks.