views:

36

answers:

2

I am building a Rails app that I manage with Git. All is perfect, but I'd like keep a public version as well as a private one. That is:

  • the public version is for a public repository (for people to use),
  • and the private version is for my own site.

The idea is that both versions should be up-to-date, with the difference that my private version's files contain passwords for my site, and the public version doesn't (or contains some default values as such).

I've been thinking of branches: master (the public version) and some private one.
But it seems that I'd have to do a lot of merging after each commit.

Please, bear in mind, that I am a asking for I am still quite a noob at git.

Thanks folks!

+4  A: 

I would:

  • store the password in a private repo which contains only sensitive data
  • store in the public repo:
    • a reference to the private repo as a submodule (only you could checkout that submodule, since it is a private repo)
    • some template config
    • some script able to build the actual config file with the right value:
      • default value if there is no submodule
      • passwords if the submodule is checked-out.

That way, no merge whatsoever, and no way to push sensitive data to a public repo.

VonC
Thanks! It turns out that I'd use Noufal's method, but thanks for the general ideas!
Albus Dumbledore
+1 This is generic. Thanks.
Noufal Ibrahim
+4  A: 

I do Django development and keep all my sensitive data inside a single file which I put inside my .gitignore. It's not version controlled and I keep separate versions of this on my deployment server and local dev machine.

Noufal Ibrahim
Yeah. Right. I could be simple :-D Thanks! I could actually have defaults preset, and then overwrite them using some one-place config.
Albus Dumbledore
Superior ability breeds superior Ambition - Spock. ;)
Noufal Ibrahim
+1. I like the simplicity of it, but as you said, my method is a generic one.
VonC