I am certain two branches of my Git repo should only ever be different in a single file. The simplest way to ensure this is to do all work in branch1
, and merge it into branch2
whenever I switch to it (wrapped into a shell script, so I only need one command per switch). However, is there a way to do this with even less work?
views:
34answers:
1
+1
A:
Yes, use a git filter driver, with a smudge script intelligent enough to:
- recognize it is dealing with that single file (reminder: such a script only deals with file content, not file*name*)
- put the right content depending on the current branch.
But the question is: do you need two branches at all?
If this is a config file, as mentioned in "Git: how maintain (mostly) parallel branches with only a few difference?", storing templates might be better. That same question proposes other alternatives.
VonC
2010-10-29 11:53:55
Excellent, I will look into it!
Alexey Romanov
2010-10-29 13:37:09