views:

177

answers:

4

I know that NTFS supports encryption but otherwise is closed source. Likewise, I am aware of add-ins such as truecrypt but I am interested in encryption being built-in vs being bolted on.

+2  A: 

No.

There's Bitlocker, but it's implementation is closed source. Everything else not manufactured by Microsoft will, by definition, be "bolted on". Microsoft doesn't provide any open source filesystems in their OSes, AFAIK.

Furious Coder
+1  A: 

Keep in mind that encryption is often not done at the filesystem level. It's done at the block level, where sectors are actually read/written to disk. This allows one to use any filesystem with the encryption, as the filesystem sits on top of the encryption layer.

MadCoder
+1  A: 

Any specific use cases?

TrueCrypt supports full volume encryption, with a boot password. I have been unable to confirm this, but I believe that BitLocker also requires a password at boot. TrueCrypt is the only option I've been able to find, and it is relatively mature. Full disk encryption with TrueCrypt would be transparent - I'm not sure what you mean by "bolted-on", but I assume you mean not having to mount an encrypted volume each time you log in.

Edit: Unfortunately there is no version of FUSE for Windows. There are the Dokan libraries, but they're not widely used AFAIK.

Tyler D
A: 

Personally, I use TrueCrypt, but PGP is excellent too.

JP Alioto