views:

1316

answers:

3

Is it possible to declare anonymous implementations of things like Delegates in Objective-C. I think I have the terminology right, but here's a java example:

myClass.addListener(new FancyInterfaceListener({
    void onListenerInterestingAction(Action a){
        ....interesting stuff here
    }
});

So for example to handle an UIActionSheet call I have to declare another method in the same class, which seems a bit silly if I want to pass it data, because I'd have to store that data as a global variable. Here's an example of deleting something with a confirmation dialog asking you if your sure:

-(void)deleteItem:(int)indexToDelete{
    UIActionSheet *confirm = [[UIActionSheet alloc] initWithTitle:@"Delete Item?" delegate:self cancelButtonTitle:@"Cancel" destructiveButtonTitle:@"Delete" otherButtonTitles:nil];
    [confirm showInView:self.view];
    [confirm release];
}

and the UIActionSheetDelegate in the same class:

- (void)actionSheet:(UIActionSheet *)actionSheet clickedButtonAtIndex:(NSInteger)buttonIndex{
    if (buttonIndex == 0){
     [[Settings sharedSettings] removeItemAtIndex:/*need index variable here*/];
     [drinksTable reloadData];
    }
}

What I want to be able to do is declare it inline, just like I did in the java example at the top. Is this possible?

+1  A: 

Objective-C doesn't have a notion of anonymous classes like Java's, so you can't create a class "inline" like in the Java code.

mipadi
Fair enough, so is there any way to do this more elegantly than creating another method in the same class? What if I wanted two different UIActionSheets?
rustyshelf
For two action sheets you would use the tag property to see which one called the delegate method. If you get into many situations like this tho, I think the responsibility of that controller might be too great. There is nothing more elegant than the way you have it. You have to keep track of the item index yourself as far as I know.
Jab
+7  A: 

There is no way to do this in Objective-C currently. Apple has published some work on their efforts to add blocks (really more like lambda closures than anonymous classes) to the language. You would likely be able to do something similar to the anonymous delegate with those.

In the mean time, most Cocoa programmers add the delegate methods to a separate category on the delegate class. This helps to keep the code more organized. In the .m file for the class in your example, I would do something like this:

@interface MyClass (UIActionSheetDelegate)
- (void)actionSheet:(UIActionSheet*)actionSheet clickedButtonAtIndex:(NSInteger)buttonIndex;
@end

@implementation MyClass
//... normal stuff here
@end

@implementation MyClass (UIActionSheetDelegate)
- (void)actionSheet:(UIActionSheet *)actionSheet clickedButtonAtIndex:(NSInteger)buttonIndex{
    if (buttonIndex == 0){
        [[Settings sharedSettings] removeItemAtIndex:/*need index variable here*/];
        [drinksTable reloadData];
    }
}
@end

Xcode's method popup in the editor window will separate the category's declaration and implementation from the main class'.

Barry Wark
Do you need to have the interface declaration for each protocol you implement? If so, that's a lot more work. (I've never declared the methods in an implemented protocol in my interface, on the premise that simply declaring the protocol "implemented" was good enough.)
Greg Maletic
No, you can declare multiple protocols, just use a comma in the interface.Also, most code I've seen, rather than using a category like this (this isn't really what the feature is designed for -- it's designed to allow you to extend classes you don't have the implementation to without subclassing), simply separates the code into its own section in the file with `#pragma mark` directive.
Colin Barrett
+1  A: 

I believe that anonymous classes can be implemented in Objective-C, but it will take a lot of NSProxy magic and IMP madness. This is one of my current projects.

Jonathan Sterling