I have a process that needs to do some work every fifteen seconds. I'm currently doing it like this:
-behavior(gen_server). interval_milliseconds ()-> 15000. init()-> {ok, _State = FascinatingStateData, _TimeoutInterval = interval_milliseconds () }. %% This gets called automatically as a result of our handlers %% including the optional _TimeoutInterval value in the returned %% Result handle_info(timeout, StateData)-> {noreply, _State = do_some_work(StateData), _TimeoutInterval = interval_milliseconds () }.
This works, but it's extremely brittle: if I want to teach my server a new message, when I write any new handler function, I have to remember to include the optional timeout interval in its return value. That is, say if I'm handling a synchronous call, I need to do this:
%% Someone wants to know our state; tell them handle_call(query_state_data, _From, StateData)-> {reply, StateData, _NewStateData = whatever (), interval_milliseconds ()};
instead of
%% Someone wants to know our state; tell them handle_call(query_state_data, _From, StateData)-> {reply, StateData, _NewStateData = whatever ()};
As you might guess, I've made that very mistake a number of times. It's nasty, because once the code handles that query_state_data message, the timeouts no longer get generated, and the whole server grinds to a halt. (I can "defibrillate" it manually by getting a shell on the machine and sending a "timeout" message by hand, but ... eww.)
Now, I could try to remember to always specify that optional Timeout parameter in my Result value. But that doesn't scale: I'll forget someday, and will be staring at this bug once again. So: what's a better way?
I don't think I want to write an actual loop that runs forever, and spends most of its time sleeping; that seems counter to the spirit of OTP.