The numeric_limits traits is supposed to be a general way of obtaining various type infomation, to be able to do things like
template<typename T>
T min(const std::vector<T>& vect)
{
T val = std::numeric_limits<T>::min();
for(int i=0 ; i<vect.size() ; i++)
val = max(T, vect[i]);
return val;
}
The problem is that (at least using MS Visual Studio 2008) numeric_limits<int>::min() returns the smallest negative number, while numeric_limits<double>::min() returns the smallest positive number!
Anyone knows the rationalie behind this design? Is there a better (recommended?) way of using numeric_limits? In my specific function above, I could of course initialize T to vect[0], but that is not the answer I am looking for..
See also (floating-point-specific) discussion here