views:

978

answers:

5

I have a table which maps String->Integer.

Rather than create an enum statically, I want to populate the enum with values from a database. Is this possible ?

So, rather than delcaring this statically:

public enum Size { SMALL(0), MEDIUM(1), LARGE(2), SUPERSIZE(3) };

I want to create this enum dynamically since the numbers {0,1,2,3} are basically random (because they are autogenerated by the database's AUTOINCREMENT column).

+9  A: 

No. Enums are always fixed at compile-time. The only way you could do this would be to dyamically generate the relevant bytecode.

Having said that, you should probably work out which aspects of an enum you're actually interested in. Presumably you weren't wanting to use a switch statement over them, as that would mean static code and you don't know the values statically... likewise any other references in the code.

If you really just want a map from String to Integer, you can just use a Map<String, Integer> which you populate at execution time, and you're done. If you want the EnumSet features, they would be somewhat trickier to reproduce with the same efficiency, but it may be feasible with some effort.

So, before going any further in terms of thinking about implementation, I suggest you work out what your real requirements are.

(EDIT: I've been assuming that this enum is fully dynamic, i.e. that you don't know the names or even how many values there are. If the set of names is fixed and you only need to fetch the ID from the database, that's a very different matter - see Andreas' answer.)

Jon Skeet
Look at BeanShell if you want to dynamically generate the code and compile it at runtime.
Peter Lawrey
+2  A: 

enums are not dynamic so the short answer is that you can't do it.

Also have a look at this question: dynamic enum in C#.

aleemb
A: 

In all the languages I know enums are static. The compiler can make some optimizations on them. Therefore the short answer is no, you can't.

The question is why you want to use an enum in this way. What do you expect? Or in other words why not use a collection instead?

Luixv
+4  A: 

this is a bit tricky, since the population of those values happens at class-load time. so you will need a static access to a database connection

as much as i value his answers, i think Jon Skeet may be wrong this time.

take a look at this:

public enum DbEnum {

FIRST(getFromDb("FIRST")), SECOND(getFromDb("second"));

private static int getFromDb(String s) {
 PreparedStatement statement = null;
 ResultSet rs = null;
 try {
  Connection c = ConnectionFactory.getInstance().getConnection();
  statement = c.prepareStatement("select id from Test where name=?");
  statement.setString(1, s);
  rs = statement.executeQuery();
  return rs.getInt(1);

 } catch (SQLException e) {
  e.printStackTrace();
 } finally {
  try {
   rs.close();
   statement.close();
  } catch (SQLException e) {
   //ignore
  }   
 }
 throw new IllegalStateException("have no database");
}

final int value;

DbEnum(int value) {
 this.value = value;
}
 }
Andreas Petersson
You're assuming that you know at *compile-time* how many values there will be, and what they should be called. If that's the case, then that's fine - but I don't see anything in the question which suggests that. (I think your query should be selecting the ID as well, rather than just 1 :)
Jon Skeet
An informative response that reminds us about the object oriented aspects of enums - thanks, Andreas.
Kevin Day
+1  A: 

You need to replicate in code what is in the database (or vice-versa). See this question for some good advices.

kgiannakakis