I have a need for a "container" that acts like the following. It has 2 subcontainers, called A and B, and I need to be able to iterate over just A, just B, and A and B combined. I don't want to use extra space for redundant data, so I thought of making my own iterator to iterate over A and B combined. What is the easiest way to make your own iterator? Or, what is another way to do this?
EDIT Ultimately, I don't think it was good design. I have redesigned the entire class heirarchy. +1 for refactoring. However, I did solve this problem sufficiently. Here's an abbreviated version of what I did, for reference; it uses boost::filter_iterator. Let T be the type in the container.
enum Flag
{
A_flag,
B_flag
};
class T_proxy
{
public:
T_proxy(const T& t, Flag f) : t_(t), flag_(f) {}
operator T() const {return t_;}
Flag flag() const {return flag_;}
class Compare
{
public:
Compare(Flag f) : matchFlag_(f) {}
operator() (const T_proxy& tp) {return tp.flag() == matchFlag_;}
private:
Flag matchFlag_;
};
private:
T t_;
Flag flag_;
};
class AB_list
{
public:
typedef T_proxy::Compare Compare;
typedef vector<T_proxy>::iterator iterator;
typedef boost::filter_iterator<Compare, iterator> sub_iterator;
void insert(const T& val, Flag f) {data_.insert(T_proxy(val, f));}
// other methods...
// whole sequence
iterator begin() {return data_.begin();}
iterator end() {return data_.end();}
// just A
sub_iterator begin_A() {return sub_iterator(Compare(A_flag), begin(), end());
sub_iterator end_A() {return sub_iterator(Compare(A_flag), end(), end());
// just B is basically the same
private:
vector<T_proxy> data_;
};
// usage
AB_list mylist;
mylist.insert(T(), A_flag);
for (AB_list::sub_iterator it = mylist.begin_A(); it != mylist.end_A(); ++it)
{
T temp = *it; // T_proxy is convertible to T
cout << temp;
}