Anonymous said: "No, the answer is that they conviced you that you have ADHD/ADD and you bought it because you trust the doctor. Giving a name to a set of symptoms, does not mean that the "illness" really exists"
What a fool! ALL illnesses and conditions are a set of symptoms that a name tag is attributed to.
Let's give an example... cancer is a name given to a set of symptoms, but it doesn't mean that this "illness" really exists. Dur!
Whether you call a set of symptoms ADHD or X does not matter.
Example:
Say there are 3 symptoms, A, B and C.
One could describe an illness as follows:
Illness X = {A B} Illness Y = {C}
Or
Illness P = {B C} Illness Q = {A}
As a doctor I could treat illness P by helping symptoms B and C, or I could treat illness X by treating symptoms A and B. So it doesn't always matter what labels we use.
The REAL issue in how to label conditions is how symptoms statistically occur together in the general populace. e.g. does symptom B often occur with symptom A? If so it would be sensible to designate it as illness X = {A B}... BUT if symptom A rarely occurred alongside symptom B then that designation would be foolish. Anyone can see this surely!?
So the real questions to work out if an illness "exists" are as follows:
1) Do the symptoms themselves exist?
2) Do enough of the symptoms statistically occur together more than say 60% of the time (or whatever) in the general populace?
In ADHD's case 1) and 2) seem to be true. Therefore it exists! Simple as!
If you're going down your route of reasoning then we get in to foolish philosophy. Does a chair exist? It's just an arbitrary name for a set of "symptoms", e.g. 4 legs, and a back... but would then a table with a piece of wood nailed to one side to be a "back" then be a chair and if not why not!? You get my point, it's easier to get along in the world if we have some understanding of what a chair actually is.
It's the same with illnesses... especially neurological ones, as we currently understand the human brain less than 1%... so it's our best shot!
Another one might be PTSD, you might say it doesn't exist, but as a label it is useful in treating people with a particular subset of symptoms. If you don't understand what I'm trying to say then forget it.
You can't disagree that the symptoms of ADHD exist, and statistically it has been agreed that the symptoms of ADHD occur together enough to be useful in diagnosis. Once someone is labelled as having such a condition they can then use that SHORTHAND to be treated by professionals that specialise in that particular label.
To highlight this there are subset of illnesses within higher level illnesses. e.g. cancer usually designates some form of tumour(s), but there are so many different types of cancer... but why? Because they need to be treated differently.
The problem with MOST human beings is that we often don't believe someone's difficulties until WE experience them directly! I am evolved enough to give people who seem to be genuine the benefit of the doubt... but hey I work at empathy, as it's certainly not a natural state of most people.
Heart disease is a set of symptoms too! Maybe that doesn't exist either lol.
As a human race in general we need to improve our empathy skills.