views:

4100

answers:

23

In Google Code Jam 2009, Round 1B, there is a problem called Decision Tree that lent itself to rather creative solutions.

Post your shortest solution; I'll update the Accepted Answer to the current shortest entry on a semi-frequent basis, assuming you didn't just create a new language just to solve this problem. :-P

Current rankings:

+1  A: 

Here's my version at 278 bytes (with improvements from KirarinSnow to bring it down to 273), after stripping off all the newlines (except ones in string literals, of course). It only works on Guile (since in standard Scheme, define is a syntax, not an object, but Guile represents it as an object anyway).

(define ! define)
(!(c f p w . r)(if(null? r)(* p w)(apply c f(* p w)((if(memq(car r)f)cadr caddr)r))))
(!(d . l)(map display l))
(!(r . x)(read))
(! n(r))
(do((i 1(1+ i)))((> i n))(r)(let((t(r)))(d"Case #"i":
")(do((a(r)(1- a)))((= a 0))(r)(d(apply c(map r(iota(r)))1 t)"
"))))
Chris Jester-Young
+9  A: 

PostScript: 170 (regular) / 160 (ASCII85) / 121 (binary)

My shortest (regular) PostScript solution so far, provided that you rename the input file to "r" (170 characters, including newlines); uses a GhostScript-specific procedure (=only):

1[/:{repeat}/!{exch token{\ exch known{/<>}if]pop]]3 index mul
!}if}(]){token pop}/?(r)(r)file([){?]}>>begin
1[{(Case #)2{=only}:(:)=[/|[def[{[/\<<[{[/}:>>def |]! =}:}for

Usage: cp input.in r; gs -q -dNOPROMPT -dNODISPLAY -dBATCH thisfile.ps > output.out

Here's a binary version of this in 121 bytes (backslashes and unprintable characters escaped):

1[/!{\x92>\x92\xab{\\\x92>\x92`\x92p{]\x92u}if]]3\x92X\x92l!}if}(]){\x92\xab\x92u}/r(r)\x928\x92A([){r]}>>\x92\r1[{(Case #)\x92v=only[/:\x928[\x923=[{[/\\<<[{[/}\x92\x83>>\x923:]! =}\x92\x83}\x92H

If characters outside the ASCII printable range are disallowed, PS has built-in ASCII85 encoding of binary sources. We therefore have the following 160-byte solution in all ASCII printable characters:

1[([){r]}/r(r)<~OuSUj0-P\*5*Dsn>`q:6@$5JU?'9>YBkCXV1Qkk'Ca"4@Apl(5.=75YP')1:5*?@0>C.bc@<6!&,:Se!4`>4SH!;p_OuQ[/1Herh>;'5D4Bm/:07B"95!G,c3aEmO4aiKGI?I,~>cvx exec
KirarinSnow
Surely, then, for the other interpretable languages such as Perl, you could also compress the entire source into a string and then decompress it from that. Would that work out smaller, or would the source code get bloated by the decompression machinery?
Chris Dennett
@Chris: The binary in PS is just shorthand for commonly used operator names; it's not actually compression of the source. ASCII85, on the other hand, is expansion of the source; but in this case, the expansion of the binary shortcuts is still less than the original. I imagine decompression machinery would bloat source code in many cases...
KirarinSnow
+7  A: 

Common Lisp, 199 bytes

Wrapped every 80 characters:

(defun r()(read))(dotimes(i(r))(format t"~&Case #~D:"(1+ i))(r)(set'z(r))(dotime
s(a(r))(r)(print(do((g(mapcar'read(make-list(r))))(p 1(*(pop c)p))(c z(if(find(p
op c)g)(car c)(cadr c))))((not c)p)))))

Spaced and indented:

(defun r () (read))
(dotimes (i (r))
  (format t "~&Case #~D:" (1+ i))
  (r)
  (set 'z (r))
  (dotimes (a (r))
    (r)
    (print
      (do ((g (mapcar 'read (make-list (r))))
           (p 1 (* (pop c) p))
           (c z (if (find (pop c) g)
                    (car c)
                    (cadr c))))
          ((not c) p)))))
JB
Darn CL and its pop function! :-P Scheme, sadly (for code golfing), doesn't have such succinct means to modify a list.
Chris Jester-Young
+8  A: 

Python in 192

import re;S=re.sub;R=raw_input;I=input;c=0;exec r"c+=1;L=S('\) *\(',')or ',S('([a-z]+)','*(\' \\1 \'in a and',eval(('+R()'*I('Case #%s:\n'%c))[1:])));exec'a=R()+\' \';print eval(L);'*I();"*I()
gnibbler
+11  A: 

Ruby in 132

Improved by leonid. Newlines are essential.

def j
'1
'..gets
end
j.map{|c|s=j.map{gets}*''
puts"Case #%d:"%c,j.map{gets;eval s.gsub(/[a-z]+/,'*(/ \&\b/?').gsub /\)\s*\(/,'):'}}

Ruby in 136

def j;1..gets.to_i;end;j.map{|c|m=j.map{gets}*"";puts"Case ##{c}:";j.map{gets;p eval m.gsub(/[a-z]+/,'*(/ \0\s/?').gsub /\)\s*\(/,'):'}}

I just learned about *"" being equivalent to .join"". Also realised that map could be used in a few places

Ruby in 150

1.upto(gets.to_i){|c|m=eval("gets+"*gets.to_i+"''");puts"Case ##{c}:";1.upto(gets.to_i){gets;p eval m.gsub(/[a-z]+/,'*(/ \0\s/?').gsub /\)\s*\(/,'):'}}

I am just a noob to ruby, so there is probably still a lot of room for improvement

gnibbler
Wow. What does a regex in a condition even *do*, anyway? What does it operate on?
DigitalRoss
If it works like Perl, it evaluates as true if it matches, false otherwise.
JB
If it doesn't match it evaluates to nil which works like false.
gnibbler
I should add that it causes lots of these warnings(eval):1: warning: regex literal in conditionbut stdout still gets the correct result
gnibbler
Anyone want to rewrite this in golfscript?http://www.golfscript.com/golfscript/ Might be the winner then...
CodeJoust
@CodeJoust, Maybe. It's not just a rewrite though as golfscript has no support for regex or floats
gnibbler
A: 

Haskell, 514 bytes (I suck?).

Based on quibble's solution:

import Control.Monad
import Text.ParserCombinators.Parsec
data F=N|F String(Float,F)(Float,F)
r=return
f=many1 letter>>= \i->w>>d>>= \t->d>>=r.F i t
d=char '('>>w>>many1(oneOf".0123456789")>>= \g->w>>(f<|>r N)>>= \p->char ')'>>w>>r(read g,p)
w=many$oneOf" \n"
g=getLine
l=readLn
m=replicateM
main=l>>= \n->forM_[1..n]$ \t->putStrLn("Case #"++show t++":")>>l>>=(`m`g)>>=(\(Right q)->l>>=(`m`p q)).parse d"".join
z(p,f)=(p*).y f
y N _=1
y(F n t f)x=z(if n`elem`x then t else f)x
p q=fmap(drop 2.words)g>>=print.z q
yairchu
Are you sure all those leading definitions actually make your code shorter? Some of them seem unnecessary.
Chris Lutz
Which ones do you have in mind? From the imports, Control.Monad is needed for forM_, replicateM and join, Parsec is needed for pretty much anything else. From the toplevels, it seems to me they all save some characters.
JB
+17  A: 

Perl in 107 characters

say("Case #$_:"),
$_=eval"''".'.<>'x<>,
s:[a-z]+:*(/ $&\\s/?:g,s/\)\s*\(/):/g,
eval"\$_=<>;say$_;"x<>for 1..<>

Newlines for legibility; none of them is necessary or counted in.

It uses features found only in the latest versions of Perl, so run with perl -M5.010 or later.

I used to be a Perl noob too, so this works almost the same as the ruby one. Original version 126 chars, optimizations by peutri.

Backlinks:

Word Aligned - Power Programming

gnibbler
"Newlines for legibility;" (...) HA!
Alaor
A: 

C in 489 bytes

Code wrapped at 80 chars, there are actually just 3 lines.

Save in a.c and compile with: gcc -w a.c -o a

#define S int I,N;scanf("%d\n",&N);for(I=-1;++I<N;)
#define M 1000
char B[M],Z[M],Q[M]={' '},*F[M],*V;float W[M],H;int J,C,L[M],R[M];t(){V=strtok(0
," \n()");}p(){int U=C++;F[U]=0;if(!V)t();sscanf(V,"%f",W+U);t();if(V&&*V>='a')s
trcpy(Q+1,V),V=0,F[U]=strdup(strcat(Q," ")),L[U]=p(),R[U]=p();return U;}main(){S
{printf("Case #%d:\n",I+1);*B=0;{S strcat(B,gets(Z));}V=strtok(B," \n(");C=0,p()
;{S{strcat(gets(B)," ");for(J=0,H=W[0];F[J];J=strstr(B,F[J])?L[J]:R[J],H*=W[J]);
printf("%f\n",H);};}}}
druidu
+3  A: 

Java in 467 bytes

This uses the javascript interpreter contained in java 6.

import java.util.*;class D{static{Scanner c=new
Scanner(System.in);int n=c.nextInt(),i=0,l;while(i++<n){l=c.nextInt();String
s="(";while(l-->=0)s+=c.nextLine();System.out.println("Case #"+i+":");l=c.nextInt();while(l-->0)try{c.next();System.out.println(new
javax.script.ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("js").eval(s.replace(")","))").replaceAll("\\) *\\(",":(").replaceAll("[a-z]+","*(/ $0 /.test('"+c.nextLine()+" ')?")));}catch(Exception
x){}}System.exit(0);}}

Thanks Varan, Chris and pfn (indirectly) for helping me shorten it.
Please see my other (even shorter!) java answer.

aditsu
You can shorten it further by using `js` (lowercase) as the engine name.
Chris Jester-Young
+6  A: 

C - 346 bytes

Compile with gcc -w

#define N{int n=atoi(gets(A));for(;n--;)
T[999];F[99];char*t,*f,*a,A[99];float p(){float
d,m=1;for(;*t++^40;);sscanf(t,"%f %[^ (]",&d,A);if(*A^41){for(f=F;m**f;){for(;*f&&*f++^32;);for(a=A;*a&&*f==*a;f++,a++);m=*a||*f&64;}d*=!m*p()+m*p();}return
d;}main(I)N{printf("Case #%d:\n",I++);t=T;N
for(gets(t);*++t;);}N gets(F),t=T,printf("%f\n",p());}}}
gnibbler
+30  A: 

sed in 1554 chars (pure) / 281 (with bc)

Yes, seriously.

Usage: sed -r -f thisfile.sed < input.in > output.out

(works on GNU sed)

1d
/ /!{x
s/^$/Case #Y:/
:i
s/9Y/Y0/
ti
s/#Y/#0Y/
s/:/:0123456789/
s/(.)Y(.*):[0-9]*\1(.).*/\3\2Y:/
x
G
s/.*\n|Y//gp
z
:p
N
/[()]/s/ |\n//g
y/()/JK/
tp
H
d}
G
s/\n[^J]*/ %/
s/[^JK]*$//
:c
s/J1?([.-9]+)(.*)K/\2@\1/
/%@/by
:b
/J/s/T//
s/J([^JK]*)K/TC\1B/
tb
/ (.+) .*%\1C/{s/%[^C]*/%/
s/T.*B//
by}
s/%.*T/%/
:y
y/CB/JK/
tc
s/.\.0*\b//g
:r
/@.*@/{s/\w*@\w*$/C&B/
s/C(\w)(.*B)/\1C\2~/
s/"[^"]*/&0/g
:t
s/(\w)(C.*)(\w)B(.*~)/\1\2B\3\4\1\3/
T
s/~(10|2[01]|3[0-2]|4[0-3]|5[0-4]|6[0-5]|7[0-6]|8[0-7]|9.)/&Q/
s/(.)(.)Q/\2\1/
s/~0\w/`00/
s/~1\B/`0/
s/~22/`04/
s/~23/`06/
s/~24/`08/
s/~33/`09/
s/~25/`10/
s/~26|~34/`12/
s/~27/`14/
s/~28|~44/`16/
s/~29|~36/`18/
s/~35/`15/
s/~45/`20/
s/~37/`21/
s/~38|~46/`24/
s/~55/`25/
s/~39/`27/
s/~47/`28/
s/~56/`30/
s/~48/`32/
s/~57/`35/
s/~49|~66/`36/
s/~58/`40/
s/~67/`42/
s/~59/`45/
s/~68/`48/
s/~77/`49/
s/~69/`54/
s/~78/`56/
s/~79/`63/
s/~88/`64/
s/~89/`72/
s/~99/`81/
s/`(.)(.)/~\1'\2/
bt
:
s/(~.)'/\1/
s/..'/K&/
/K/bk
:v
s/=(,?.)'/\1/
s/,/1'/
t
s/B(.*)~/\1B"/
tr
s/"(\w*)0/A\1/g
/A.*A/{s/A[^A]*$/J&K/
:k
s/([^A])(J.*)([^A])K/\2K\1\3/
s/K(10|2[01]|3[0-2]|4[0-3]|5[0-4]|6[0-5]|7[0-6]|8[^9]|9.)/&Q/
s/(.)(.)Q/\2\1/
s/K0/=/
s/K11/=2/
s/K12/=3/
s/K13|K22/=4/
s/K14|K23/=5/
s/K15|K24|K33/=6/
s/K16|K25|K34/=7/
s/K(17|26|35|44)/=8/
s/K(18|27|36|45)/=9/
s/K(19|28|37|46|55)/W0/
s/K(29|38|47|56)/W1/
s/K(39|48|57|66)/W2/
s/K49|K58|K67/W3/
s/K59|K68|K77/W4/
s/K69|K78/W5/
s/K79|K88/W6/
s/K89/W7/
s/K99/W8/
s/W/=,/
/'/bv
s/\b=/K:/
tk
s/[:JK]A?//g
s/,/,0123456789GF/
s/(.),.*\1(.).*F/\2/
s/G/,0/
tk}
/A.*A/bv}
s/\w*C.*A//
tr
s/.*@/./

This solution omits the leading zero in front of the decimal point, and does not handle cases where the answer is 1.00. Luckily, the GCJ judge accepts the lack of a zero, and does not have any cases where the answer is 1.00.

To include the leading zero, change the last line to s/.*@/0./; and to handle a 1.00 case, append the line s/^$/1/.

Here's a solution that outsources the multiplication to bc:

1d
/ /!{x
s/\n.*//
s/.*/echo 0&+1|bc/e
x
g
s/.*/Case #&:/p
:p
N
/[()]/s/ |\n//g
y/()/JK/
tp
H
d}
G
s/\n[^J]*/ %/
s/[^JK]*$//
:c
s/J([.-9]+)(.*)K/\2*\1/
/%\*/s/.*%.(.*)/echo \1|bc -l/e
:b
/J/s/T//
s/J([^JK]*)K/TC\1B/
tb
/ (.+) .*%\1C/{s/%[^C]*/%/
s/T.*B//
b}
s/%.*T/%/
:
y/CB/JK/
tc
KirarinSnow
The unobfuscated code looks pretty obfuscated to me!
Terry Donaghe
You are one sick puppy
Mike Robinson
Your family is worried about you. Go outside a little
M28
+1 for awesomeness.
shuttle87
+5  A: 

PHP in 314

<?php function q(){return trim(fgets(STDIN));}for($n=q($x=0);$x++<$n;){for($s=q($t='');$s--;$t.=q());echo"Case #$x:\n";for($z=q();$z--;){$l=explode(' ',q());$l[0]=0;printf("%f\n",eval('return'.preg_replace(array('/\(/','/(\w+),/','/(\d\)*),\((\d)/','/^./'),array(',(','*(in_array("$1",$l,1)?','$1:$2'),$t).';'));}}
Hyperlisk
A: 

C++ in 698 bytes
Compile with 'g++ -o test source.cpp -include iostream -include vector -include sstream'

#define R(x,f,t) for(int x=f;x<t;x++){
#define S(x) x.size()
#define H string
#define U while
#define I if
#define D cin>>
#define X t.substr(p,S(t))
using namespace std;
int main(){int h,l,n,a,p,Y,W;D h;for(int q=1;q<=h;q++){D l;H s;char c;D c;R(i,0,l)H L;getline(cin,L);R(j,0,S(L))I (L[j]==41||L[j]==40)s+=32;s+=L[j];I(L[j]==40)s+=32;}}D a;printf("Case #%d:\n",q);R(i,0,a)H N;D N;D n;vector<H>f;R(j,0,n)D N;f.push_back(N);}H t=s;float P=1;p=0;U(p<S(t)-1){p=0;U(t[p]!=48&&t[p]!=49)p++;t=X;stringstream T(t);float V;T>>V;H F;T>>F;P*=V;I(F[0]==41)break;Y=0;R(j,0,S(f))if(F==f[j])Y=1;}p=t.find(40)+1;t=X;p=0;I(Y==0){W=1;U (W>0){I(t[p]==40)W++;I(t[p]==41)W--;p++;}t=X;p=0;}}cout<<P<<endl;}}return 0;}

EDIT: I'm sorry; I thought it was ok for the includes (eg, C works even w/o including basic libraries), while I'm sure it would be if I decleared the defines this way. I'm not home now, and I won't be for some time: I won't be able to modify it. Just ignore my submission.

spiglerg
The includes on the compilation command line feel like cheating. If you go that path, you might just as well put all the defines there too, which the other languages haven't done. (see for example Scheme, Haskell, Java, CL, C)
JB
OTOH, you probably don't need the newline after the using namespace (-1), and could declare `q` with the other ints (-2). You might also try *not* to `return 0` at the end; though it's dubious C++, I recall it works with most compilers anyway.
JB
btw, thanks for the hints. :)
spiglerg
The c++ standard explicitly states (3.6.1):"If control reaches the end of main without encountering a return statement, the effect is that of executing 'return 0'"
TC
+3  A: 

Haskell, 312 characters

Here's another aproach to Haskell. I left the dirty work to the Prelude's lex. The wrapping around it is Text.ParserCombinators.ReadP. Importing it cost 36 characters on its own—ugh!

The parser is a Features -> SExp -> Cuteness function, which spares me most of the type declarations in quibble's/yairchu's solution.

import Text.ParserCombinators.ReadP
main=f(\t->do putStrLn$"Case #"++show t++":";s<-r g;r$print.fst.head.($id=<<s).readP_to_S.d.tail.words=<<g)
d x=do"("<-e;w<-e;c<-do{f<-e;y<-d x;n<-d x;u$if elem f x then y else n}<++u 1.0;e;u$c*read w
f x=do n<-g;mapM x[1..read n]
e=readS_to_P lex
r=f.const
g=getLine
u=return

It used to use Control.Monad's join, forM_ and replicateM, but it turns out it takes less space to redefine them approximately than to import.

I also abandoned the Prelude's readParen in favor of just calling lex before and after. In the current version, there is no need to verify the closing parenthesis: on a valid input it will always be there. On the other hand, it is vital to check the opening one: since the number is only converted after the whole subexpression has been read, a lot of backtracking would be needed to align to the correct parse.

On a theoretical machine with infinite memory and time to spare, the "("<- part might be dropped (4 characters' gain, 308 in total). Unless the call to read just aborts. On mine, the stack just overflows pretty fast.

JB
+6  A: 

JavaScript in 196 bytes

r='replace'
q=readline
for(n=0,t=q();t-n++;){for(print('Case #'+n+':'),d='',x=q();x--;d+=q());for(x=q();x--;)print(eval(d[r](/([a-z]+)/g,'*({'+q()[r](/ /g,':1,z')+':1}.z$1?')[r](/\) *\(/g,'):')))}

Usage: $ smjs thisfile.js <input.in

With contributions by Hyperlisk.

KirarinSnow
+2  A: 

FORTRAN - 381

Save as a.F95
Compile with f95 a.F95

#define _ ENDDO
#define A READ(t(k:l-1),*),a
#define Q j=1,n;READ"(A)",s
#define R READ*,n;DO
#define S k+SCAN(t(k:),'()')
CHARACTER(999)s,t,u;R i=1,n;t="";PRINT"('Case #'i0':')",i
R Q;t=TRIM(t)//s;_;R Q;d=1;k=1;DO;k=S;l=S-1
IF(t(l:l)>"(")EXIT;A,u;d=d*a;k=l;m=0
IF(INDEX(s," "//TRIM(u)//" ")>0)CYCLE;DO;IF(')'>t(k:k))m=m+2;m=m-1;k=k+1
IF(1>m)EXIT;k=S-1;_;_;A;d=d*a;PRINT*,d;_;_;END

By using the default format, each of the results starts with 2 spaces, but the google judge permits it. Thanks google judge!

EXPANDED VERSION

CHARACTER(999)s,t,u
READ*,n
DO i=1,n
    t=""
    PRINT"('Case #'I0':')",i
    READ*,n
    DO j=1,n
        READ"(A)",s
        t=TRIM(t)//s
    ENDDO
    READ*,n
    DO j=1,n
        READ"(A)",s
        d=1
        k=1
        DO
            k=k+SCAN(t(k:),'()')
            l=k+SCAN(t(k:),'()')-1
            IF(t(l:l)>"(")THEN
                READ(t(k:l-1),*),a
                d=d*a
                PRINT*,d
                EXIT
            ELSE
                READ(t(k:l-1),*),a,u
                d=d*a
                k=l
                m=0
                IF(INDEX(s," "//TRIM(u)//" ")>0)CYCLE
                DO
                    IF(')'>t(k:k))m=m+2
                    m=m-1
                    k=k+1
                    IF(1>m)EXIT
                    k=k+SCAN(t(k:),'()')-1
                ENDDO
            ENDIF
        ENDDO
    ENDDO
ENDDO
END
gnibbler
+6  A: 

Arc, 143 154 characters

Very similar to the CL one, but Arc sure has terse identifiers. Wrapped every 40 chars:

(for i 1((= r read))(prn"Case #"i":")(r)
(= z(r))(repeat(r)(r)(loop(= g(n-of(r)(r
))c z p 1)c(= p(*(pop c)p)c(if(pos(pop c
)g)c.0 cadr.c)))prn.p))

Indented:

(for i 1 ((= r read))
  (prn "Case #" i ":")
  (r)
  (= z (r))
  (repeat (r)
    (r)
    (loop (= g (n-of (r) (r))
             c z
             p 1)
       c
       (= p (* (pop c) p)
          c (if (pos (pop c) g)
                (c 0)
                (cadr c))))
    (prn p)))

Backlink: Word Aligned - Power Programming

JB
A: 

OCaml in 718 bytes

I'm an OCaml n00b, so this is probably much longer than it needs to be.

Usage: ocaml thisfile.ml <input.in >output.out

#load"str.cma";;open List;;open String;;open Str;;let x=length and
y=Printf.printf and e=global_replace and h=float_of_string and b=regexp and
k=index and r=read_line and a=read_int and w s m c=sub s(c+1)(m-c-1);;for i=1to
a()do y"Case #%d:\n"i;let t=let n=a()in let rec g d j=if j>n then d else
g(d^(r()))(j+1)in e(b" ")""(e(b"\\b")"^"(g""1))and n=a()in let rec z j=if j>n
then()else let q=tl(split(b" ")(r()))in let rec g l j s p=let o=k s '('and c=k
s ')'in if j then let f=w s c o in if contains f '('then let m=k s '^'in let
c=index_from s(m+1)'^'in g 0(mem(w s c m)q)(w s(x s)c)(h(w s m o)*.p)else h f*.p
else if o<c then g(l+1)j(w s(x s)o)p else g(l-1)(l=1)(w s(x s)c)p in y"%f\n"(g
0(0=0)t 1.);z(j+1)in z 1done
KirarinSnow
+11  A: 

LilyPond: 212 characters

Craziness! Utter ridiculousness!! LilyPond, with its built-in Scheme interpreter, manages to outdo Scheme by more than FIFTY BYTES! Holy acrobatic flying mooses in tights!!

x=#lambda
w=#read
#(letrec((v(x(a)(map a(iota(w)1))))(c(x(f q)(*(car q)(if(any list? q)(c
f((if(memq(cadr q)f)caddr cadddr)q))1)))))(v(x(i)(w)(set! @(w))(format
#t"Case #~a:
~{~y~}"i(v(x i(w)(c(v(x i(w)))@)))))))

Usage: lilypond thisfile.ly <input.in >output.out 2>/dev/null

Credit goes to cky for writing the Scheme solution this was based on, though this version is now substantially different. Seriously, though, the Scheme could be golfed a bit further...

KirarinSnow
+1, reference to flying mooses in tights.
kprobst
A: 

R in 280 bytes

Note: On the standard distribution of R (as of v. 2.9.2), this program does not pass the large input and fails on just Case 28 (which is nested to 99 levels), generating a "contextstack overflow". To fix this, modify the line in src/main/gram.c that reads

#define CONTEXTSTACK_SIZE 50

and replace the 50 with something like 500. Then recompile. Et voilà!

n=0
g=gsub
eval(parse(text=g('[^
]* [0-9]+( [^
]*|
)','f=c(\\1)
cat(eval(d),"
")
',g('
\\(','
cat("Case #",n<-n+1,":
",sep="")
d=expression(',g('" "','","',g(')\\s*\\(',',',g(' *("[a-z]+")\\s*\\(','*ifelse(\\1%in%f,',g('([a-z]+)','"\\1"',paste(readLines('A'),collapse='
')))))))))

Usage (requires renaming input): cp input.in A; R -q --slave -f thisfile.R >output.out

KirarinSnow
+1  A: 

Pure java in 462 bytes

Looks like I've achieved what I thought was impossible: a shorter java solution that doesn't use any eval trick! Lo and behold:

import java.util.*;class F{static Scanner c,d;static float p(String a){return
d.nextFloat()*(d.hasNext("\\D+")?a.contains(' '+d.next()+' ')?p(a)+0*p(a):0*p(a)+p(a):1);}static{c=new
Scanner(System.in);int n=c.nextInt(),i=0,l;while(i++<n){l=c.nextInt();String
s="";while(l-->=0)s+=c.nextLine();System.out.println("Case #"+i+":");l=c.nextInt();while(l-->0){c.next();d=new
Scanner(s.replaceAll("[()]"," "));System.out.println(p(c.nextLine()+' '));}}System.exit(0);}}

Thanks pfn for showing me a dirty trick to avoid the "main" method.

aditsu
It's possible to import statics as of 1.5.0 (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/static-import.html). You can possibly use this on System.out and perhaps save a bit of code.
Chris Dennett
Yes, but the import statement would be "import static java.lang.System.*;" which is longer than the savings it brings. The code ends up taking 467 bytes. Unless you can write the import in a shorter way.
aditsu
A: 

F#: 759 significant chars (Wow, I'm bad at this ;) )

Minimized version

open System.Text.RegularExpressions
type t=T of float*(string*t*t)option
let rec e=function x,T(w,Some(s,a,b))->e(x,if Set.contains s x then a else b)*w|x,T(w,_)->w
let rec h x=Regex.Matches(x, @"\(|\)|\d\.\d+|\S+")|>Seq.cast<Match>|>Seq.map (fun x -> x.Value)|> Seq.toList
let rec p=function ")"::y->p y|"("::w::x::y->match x with ")"->T(float w,None),y|n->let a,f=p y in let b,g=p f in T(float w,Some(n,a,b)),g
let solve input =
    Regex.Matches(input,@"(\(((?<s>\()|[^()]|(?<-s>\)))*\)(?(s)(?!)))\s+\d+\s+((\S+\s\d(.+)?\s*)+)")
    |>Seq.cast<Match>
    |>Seq.map(fun m->fst(p(h(m.Groups.[1].Value))), [for a in m.Groups.[3].Value.Trim().Split([|'\n'|])->set(a.Split([|' '|]))])
    |>Seq.iteri(fun i (r,c)->printfn"Case #%i"(i+1);c|>Seq.iter(fun x->printfn"%.7F"(e(x, r))))

Readable version

open System.Text.RegularExpressions

type decisionTree = T of float * (string * decisionTree * decisionTree) option
let rec eval = function 
    | x, T(w, Some(s, a, b)) -> eval(x, if Set.contains s x then a else b) * w
    | x, T(w, _) -> w

// creates a token stream
let rec tokenize tree =
    Regex.Matches(tree, @"\(|\)|\d\.\d+|\S+")
    |> Seq.cast<Match>
    |> Seq.map (fun x -> x.Value)
    |> Seq.toList

// converts token stream into a decisionTree
let rec parse = function
    | ")"::xs -> parse xs
    | "("::weight::x::xs ->
        match x with
        | ")" -> T(float weight, None), xs
        | name ->
            let t1, xs' = parse xs
            let t2, xs'' = parse xs'
            T(float weight, Some(name, t1, t2)), xs''

// uses regex to transform input file into a Seq<decisionTree, list<set<string>>, which each item in our 
// list will be tested against the decisionTree
let solve input =
    Regex.Matches(input, @"(\(((?<s>\()|[^()]|(?<-s>\)))*\)(?(s)(?!)))\s+\d+\s+((\S+\s\d(.+)?\s*)+)")
    |> Seq.cast<Match>
    |> Seq.map (fun m -> fst(parse(tokenize(m.Groups.[1].Value))), [for a in m.Groups.[3].Value.Trim().Split([|'\n'|]) -> set(a.Split([|' '|])) ])
    |> Seq.iteri (fun i (tree, testCases) ->
            printfn "Case #%i" (i+1)
            testCases |> Seq.iter (fun testCase -> printfn "%.7F" (eval (testCase, tree)))
        )
Juliet
A: 

m4 with echo and bc, 339 bytes

This solution is a complete and utter hack, and it gives me a headache. It contains, among other things, escaped double quotes, unescaped double quotes, unescapable backquote and single quote pairs (including a nested pair seven quotes deep), unquoted regular expressions, outsourcing decimal multiplication to bc, and the use of craZy caSE to circumvent macro expansion. But it had to be done, I guess. :p

This adds an "ultimate macroizing" solution to the previous kinds of solutions (iterated loops, recursion w/ lambda mapping, labels and branches, regexp and eval, etc.)

I think a good term for this is "macroni code" :D

(wrapped every 60 characters, for clarity)

define(T,`translit($@)')define(Q,`patsubst($@)')define(I,0)Q
(T(T(T(Q(Q(Q(Q(Q(Q(T(include(A),(),<>),>\s*>,>>),>\s*<,>;),\
([a-z]+\)\s*<,`*ifElsE<rEgExp<P;``````` \1 ''''''';0>;0;<'),
^<,`defiNe<````I';iNcr<I>>\\"Case `#'I:\\"defiNe<`A'''';'),^
[0-9]*),.+ [0-9]+.*,`dEfiNE<```P';`\& '''>A'),<>;N,`(),n'),E
,e),()),.*,`syscmd(`echo "\&"|bc -l')')

Usage: $ cp input.in A; m4 thisfile.m4 > output.out

I'm an m4 n00b, though, having learned it only an hour before writing this. So there's probably room for improvement.

KirarinSnow