Maven best practice for generating multiple jars with different/filtered classes ?

Question

I developed a Java utility library (similarly to Apache Commons) that I use in various projects. Additionally to fat clients I also use it for mobile clients (PDA with J9 Foundation profile). In time the library that started as a single project spread over multiple packages. As a result I end up with a lot of functionality but not really needed in all the projects.

Since this library is also used inside some mobile/PDA projects I need a way to collect just the used classes and generate the actual specialized jars

Currently in the projects that area using this library, I have Ant jar tasks that generate (from the utility project) the specialized jar files (ex: my-util-1.0-pda.jar, my-util-1.0-rcp.jar) using include/exclude jar task features. This is mostly needed due to the generated jar size constraints for the mobile projects.

Migrating now to Maven I just wonder if there are any best practices to arrive to something similar so I consider the following scenarios:

[1] - additionally to the main jar artifact (my-lib-1.0.jar) also generating inside my-lib project the separate/specialized artifacts using classifiers (ex: my-lib-1.0-pda.jar) using Maven Jar Plugin or Maven Assembly Plugin filtering/includes ... I'm not very comfortable with this approach since it pollute the library with library consumers demands (filters)

[2] - Create additional Maven projects for all the specialized clients/projects, that will "wrap" the "my-lib" and generate the filtered jar artifacts (ex: my-lib-wrapper-pda-1.0 ...etc). As a result, these wrapper projects will include the filtering (to generate the filtered artifact) and will depend just on the "my-lib" project and the client projects will depend on my-lib-wrapper-xxx-1.0 instead of my-lib-1.0. This approach my look problematic since even that will let "my-lib" project intact (with no additional classifiers & artifacts), basically will double the number of projects since for every client project I'll have one just to collect the needed classes from the "my-util" library ("my-pda-app" project will need a "my-lib-wrapper-for-my-pda-app" project/dependency)

[3] - Into the every client project that use the library (ex: my-pda-app) add some specialized Maven plugins to trim - out (when generating the final artifact/package) the un-needed classes (ex: maven-assembly-plugin, maven-jar-plugin, proguard-maven-plugin)

What is the best practice for solving this kind of problems in the "Maven way" ?!

Answer 1

The Maven general rule is "one primary artifact per POM" for the sake of modularity and the reasons one shouldn't break this convention (in general) are very well explained in the How to Create Two JARs from One Project (...and why you shouldn’t) blog post. There are however justified exceptions (for example an EJB project producing an EJB JAR and a client EJB JAR with only interfaces). Having that said:

The mentioned blog post (also check Using Maven When You Can't Use the Conventions) explains how you could implement Option 1 using separate profiles or the JAR plugin. If you decide to implement this solution, keep in mind that this should be an exception and that it might make dependency management trickier (and, as you mentioned, pollute the project with "client filtering logic"). Just in case, I would use several JAR plugin executions here.

Option 2 isn't very different from Option 1 IMO (except that it separate things): basically, having N other wrapping/filtering projects is very similar with having N filtering rules in one project. And if filtering makes sense, I prefer Option 1.

I don't like Option 3 at all because I think it shouldn't be the responsibility of a client of a library to "trim out" unwanted things. First, a client project doesn't necessarily have the required knowledge (what to trim) and, second, this might create a big mess with other plugins.

BUT if the fat clients are not using the whole my-lib (like server-side code would require the whole EJB JAR), then filtering isn't the right "maven way" to handle your situation. The right way would be Option 4: put everything common in a project (producing my-lib-core-1.0.jar) and specific parts in specific projects (that will produce my-lib-pda-1.0.jar etc). Clients would then depend on the core artifact and specialized ones.