I have an Access database that contains a table with information about parts we sort. This table has an autonumber ID field and a 110ID that links to another table with the part information. It also contains a sortDate, sortShift, sorted, scrapped, and repaired. I need to find how many parts have been sorted since the last defect (none scrapped or repaired) was found for each 110ID.
The problem is that I cannot guarantee that the information will be entered into the database in chronological order. So I need sum the 'sorted' field for any records that have a 'sortDate' greater than the last defect, or a 'sortDate' the same as the last defect but greater 'sortShift', or use the autonumber id as a last resort if both the 'sortDate' and 'sortShift' match.
This is the query I am currently using:
SELECT SortInfo.[110ID], Sum(SortInfo.Sorted) AS SumOfSorted
FROM SortInfo
WHERE (
((SortInfo.sortdate)>(select top 1 dupe.sortdate from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc)))
OR (((SortInfo.sortdate)=(select top 1 dupe.sortdate from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc))
AND ((SortInfo.sortshift)>(select top 1 dupe.sortshift from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc)))
OR (((SortInfo.sortdate)=(select top 1 dupe.sortdate from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc))
AND ((SortInfo.sortshift)=(select top 1 dupe.sortshift from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc))
AND ((SortInfo.ID)>(select top 1 dupe.id from sortinfo as dupe where (((dupe.[110id])=(sortinfo.[110id])) and (((dupe.repaired)<>0) or ((dupe.scrapped)<>0))) order by dupe.sortdate desc, dupe.sortshift desc, dupe.id desc))
)
GROUP BY SortInfo.[110ID];
The problem is that this is extremely slow. Is there a better way to accomplish this that will yield better performance?