views:

583

answers:

3

How would one go about linking (some) symbols to specific fixed addresses using GNU ld so that the binary could still be executed as normal in Linux (x86)? There will not be any accesses to those symbols, but their addresses are important.

For example, I'd have the following structure:

struct FooBar {
    Register32 field_1;
    Register32 field_2;
    //...
};

struct FooBar foobar;

I'd like to link foobar to address 0x76543210, but link the standard libraries and the rest of the application normally. The application will then make use of the address of foobar, but will not reference the (possibly non-existent) memory behind it.

The rationale for this request is that this same source can be used on two platforms: On the native platform, Register32 can simply be a volatile uint32_t, but on Linux Register32 is a C++ object with the same size as a uint32_t that defines e.g. operator=, which will then use the address of the object and sends a request to a communication framework with that address (and the data) to perform the actual access on remote hardware. The linker would thus ensure the Register32 fields of the struct refer to the correct "addresses".

A: 

I'll give you the hot tip... GNU LD can do this (assuming the system libs don't need the address you want). You just need to build your own linker script instead of using the compiler's autogenerated one. Read the man page for ld. Also, building a linker script for a complex piece of software is no easy task when you involve the GLIBC too.

Adam Hawes
The ld documentation wasn't very useful, at least with only a few hours' study. I tried adapting the compiler's default linker script, but gave up when I noticed it won't link even with the (unedited) extracted default script (while it of course links ok without a linker script).
TomiJ
+2  A: 

Try it with

--defsym symbol=expression

As with this:

gcc -Wl,--defsym,foobar=0x76543210 file.c

And make foobar in your code an extern declaration:

extern struct FooBar foobar;

This looks promising. However, it's a bad idea to do such a thing (unless you really know what you do). Why do you need it?

Johannes Schaub - litb
+1  A: 

The suggestion by litb to use --defsym symbol=address does work, but is a bit cumbersome when you have a few dozen such instances to map. However, --just-symbols=symbolfile does just the trick. It took me a while to find out the syntax of the symbolfile, which is

symbolname1 = address;
symbolname2 = address;
...

The spaces seem to be required, as otherwise ld reports file format not recognized; treating as linker script.

TomiJ