Is there an advantage to dynamically attaching/detaching event handlers?
Would manually detaching handlers help ensure that there isn't a reference remaining to a disposed object?
Is there an advantage to dynamically attaching/detaching event handlers?
Would manually detaching handlers help ensure that there isn't a reference remaining to a disposed object?
Most of the the time the framwork takes care of that for you. Do you have an example of what you're trying to achieve?
Manually detaching an event can be important to prevent memory leaks: the object that connects to an event fired by another object, will not be garbage collected until the object that fires the event is garbage collected. In other words, an "event-raiser" has a strong reference to all the "event-listeners" connected to it.
I have an MDI Parent form that handles the events of a child form. When the child form is disposed, I need to make sure that the object gets garbage collected. It is possible that the form will be re-instantiated. When it is re-instantiated, will event handlers stack up and take up memory?
I find that dynamically attaching/detaching event handlers is only of use where you have a long-lived object exposes events that are consumed by many short-lived objects. For most other cases the two objects are disposed around the same time and the CLR does a sufficient job of cleaning up on its own
I'm pretty sure that the Handles
clause is just syntactic sugar and inserts an AddHandler
statement into your constructor. I tested using this code and disabled the application framework so the constructor wouldn't have extra stuff:
Public Class Form1
Public Sub New()
' This call is required by the Windows Form Designer. '
InitializeComponent()
' Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call. '
AddHandler Me.Load, AddressOf Form1_Load
End Sub
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
Dim breakpoint As Integer = 4
End Sub
End Class
The IL ended up like this:
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldarg.0
IL_0002: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]System.Windows.Forms.Form::.ctor()
IL_0007: nop
IL_0008: ldarg.0
IL_0009: ldarg.0
IL_000a: dup
IL_000b: ldvirtftn instance void WindowsApplication1.Form1::Form1_Load(object,
class [mscorlib]System.EventArgs)
IL_0011: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.EventHandler::.ctor(object,
native int)
IL_0016: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]System.Windows.Forms.Form::add_Load(class [mscorlib]System.EventHandler)
'... lots of lines here '
IL_0047: ldarg.0
IL_0048: callvirt instance void WindowsApplication1.Form1::InitializeComponent()
IL_004d: nop
IL_004e: ldarg.0
IL_004f: ldarg.0
IL_0050: dup
IL_0051: ldvirtftn instance void WindowsApplication1.Form1::Form1_Load(object,
class [mscorlib]System.EventArgs)
IL_0057: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.EventHandler::.ctor(object,
native int)
IL_005c: callvirt instance void [System.Windows.Forms]System.Windows.Forms.Form::add_Load(class [mscorlib]System.EventHandler)
IL_0061: nop
IL_0062: nop
IL_0063: ret
} // end of method Form1::.ctor
Notice two identical blocks of code around IL_000b and IL_0051. I think it's just syntactic sugar.
It's not a question of using AddHandler versus Handles.
If you are concerned about the reference to your event handler interfering with garbage collection, you should use RemoveHandler, regardless of how the handler was attached. In the form or control's Dispose method, remove any handlers.
I have had situations in Windows Forms apps (.NET 1.1 days) where an event handler would be called on controls that had no other references to them (and which for all intents and purposes were dead and I would have thought been GC'ed) -- extremely hard to debug.
I would use RemoveHandler to get rid of handlers on controls that you are not going to reuse.
I manually attach handlers when I manually create controls (for example, dynamically creating a TextBox for each database record). I manually detach handlers when they are handling things I'm not quite ready to handle yet (possibly because I'm using the wrong events? :) )