views:

270

answers:

1

i am testing a simple multicast application on linux. i got it working on my pc by doing the following:

  • disabling the firewall
  • running the command route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0 dev eth0

if you are interested in the details, see this post

why are these two steps required? is there an alternative.

i am testing the code on localhost.

on another pc i tried running the program after disabling the firewall. it did not work. when i run the route command i get the following message

route: netmask 0fffffff doesn't make sense with host route
Usage: route [-nNvee] [-FC] [<AF>]           List kernel routing tables
   route [-v] [-FC] {add|del|flush} ...  Modify routing table for AF.

   route {-h|--help} [<AF>]              Detailed usage syntax for specified AF.
   route {-V|--version}                  Display version/author and exit.

    -v, --verbose            be verbose
    -n, --numeric            don't resolve names
    -e, --extend             display other/more information
    -F, --fib                display Forwarding Information Base (default)
    -C, --cache              display routing cache instead of FIB

<AF>=Use '-A <af>' or '--<af>'; default: inet
List of possible address families (which support routing):
inet (DARPA Internet) inet6 (IPv6) ax25 (AMPR AX.25) 
netrom (AMPR NET/ROM) ipx (Novell IPX) ddp (Appletalk DDP) 
x25 (CCITT X.25)

what is the solution?

A: 

got it to work without the route command. just some firewall configuration problem.

i saw this recommendation to use route command for running ping on a multicast address. it is not required here.

iamrohitbanga