views:

119

answers:

2

My company is undergoing a reasonably major relocation project and my manager, who works in a different building, will soon be located even further from my team and I than before.

While it would be fair to say we didn't see a lot of him before, his presence, involvement and interest in my team's progress is likely to all but disappear now. I consider myself to be advocating for my team effectively right now and communicating news and issues from the Development department regularly. However, I personally operate better knowing there is strong, effective leadership taking an interest in my project and providing regular feedback on its progress.

So my question is: as a development team leader, how important is your line manager's investment in your project (and you personally) in terms of project familiarity, feedback / availability and strategic guidance?

+6  A: 

I'd throw a question back at you: How important is it for you to communicate with your stakeholders so that they understand how important your project/team is to the company.

Communication is key, if you can't get a good level between yourself and management then you should organise a meeting on an appropriate schedule to simply touch base with your manager and your team so that everyone is on the same page. Depending on how far the relocation is this may or may not be practical. Just my 2c.

To directly answer your question I would say it's of paramount importance that your mangement buys in on your project. If they aren't confident in it or understand what it means for the company then you run the risk of the project being shutdown.

Spence
Well, that's a perfectly fair point and my answer would be that it's quite important. But my feeling is that while it's well and good for management to take a back seat and let the TTL run the show, I still think that the line manager should show an active interest in the work his direct reports are doing. Otherwise, how can they have confidence that the decisions they're making are sound and that their team's achievements will be properly recognised?
Phil.Wheeler
Phil, it sounds like you just said exactly what Spence did, but in a different way, which is your answer. The manager needs to realize that communication is paramount in software development. Otherwise you will be managing from the bottom up.. miscommuniciation.. conflicts.. etc.
KevinDeus
To a degree, but the difference is that the approach Spence suggests is very "push"-oriented - i.e. I'm pushing for time with my line manager and updating him because I want to. My argument is that my development team would respond to seeing him take an active, willing interest in the team's progress and send that implicit message that "your work is visible to my and I approve of the direction you're taking". I feel that little or no management presence sends the wrong message to the team: "you're not valued, I don't care how you're going as long as the work gets done".
Phil.Wheeler
Perfect world would have both happening, interested managers and good team members. You have to work within the framework that your management and team members will let you do. Sometimes I wish that management could give a straight answer, but it's likely that they'll intentionally be vague so that they can take credit or distance themselves from anything that happens.
Spence
+1  A: 

Extremely important!

Apart from the great point already made in the answer above, you could vocalize your concerns with the manager and fix up for regular and frequent meet-ups to discuss updates and issues. You may need to rely more on emails and such face to face meetings for a more formal kind of updating mechanism. Not the best method perhaps if your manager is not the kind that really pays attention to email updates, but unfortunately, if that is the case, then there is not a whole lot you can do about it except peg at it and stay on his/her radar as much as you can.

Team meetings, lunch meets, brownbags, emails, phone calls,IMs even. Just to remind him/her you are around and doing good work. If he/she is an ideal manager they would obviously take the bigger responsibility of ensuring that they are on top of things - but I guess its too much of an ask in the real world.

Critical Skill