views:

446

answers:

3

An inexperienced PHP question:

I've got a PHP script file that I need to include on different pages lots of times in lots of places.

I have the option of either breaking the included file down into several smaller files and include these on a as-needed basis... OR ... I could just keep it all together in a single PHP file.

I'm wondering if there's any performance impact of using a larger vs. smaller file for include() in this context? For example, is there any performance difference between a 200KB file and a 20KB file?

Thank you.

+3  A: 

There is certainly an impact, so be sure to use include_once() instead of include(). You could maybe consider using APC which has an include cache.

ggiroux
ggiroux... thanks... what about when the file IS cached? Unless that's a really silly question.
Tom
if it's cached I would say that the impact is very minimal, as it will be stored in precompiled bytecode in shared memory.
ggiroux
+2  A: 

There will be a difference, between a 200KB and a 20KB file... But you will probably not notice it : a 200KB file is not that big -- and you generally use a lot of files that are not "small", when you're building a big application.

There are two things that take time, when you're loading a .php file :

  • The PHP source code is "compiled" to "opcodes" -- that's quite equivalent to JAVA bytecode
    • This is done each time a PHP file is included, by default
    • But, using some opcode cache like APC, those opcodes can be kept in memory, and this compilation stuff not done each time anymore -- which is great : it'll mean less CPU used, as the compilation will not be done anymore (it'll be done only once in a while).
  • The opcodes are executed
    • Depending on what you script contains, this can take some time, or not :
    • If the file only contain functions or classes definitions, this will not take much time : nothing will get executed.
    • If the file contains instructions, it'll take more time ^^


As a sidnote : in a general situation, you'll gain a lot more time/cpu/resources optimizing your SQL queries, or adding some caching mecanism, than thinking about that kind of stuff.

Pascal MARTIN
Thank you for the added explanation.
Tom
You're welcome :-) Have fun !
Pascal MARTIN
A: 

Be careful with include_once() (and also require_once), it is more expensive to run than include(). Everytime include_once is run, PHP adds the included file to its internal index of included files, it also needs to do a lookup against that internal index before deciding whether to include the file or not. The more includes in the index, the slower this lookup is Also when using include() or include_once() try to use absolute paths where possible as this is much speedier than relative paths becuase you are not forcing PHP to work out the absolute path for you. As ggiroux said, someform of caching like APC will reap massive rewards and render worrying about how many include calls you have irrelevant (largely) (unless you have some poorly written code)

James Butler