views:

655

answers:

8

I've Googled and poked around the Go website, but I can't seem to find an explanation for Go's extraordinary build times. Are they products of the language features (or lack thereof), a highly optimized compiler, or something else? I'm not trying to promote Go; I'm just curious.

A: 

i think Go was designed in parallel with compiler creation, so they were best friends from birth. (IMO)

Andrey
+12  A: 

Dependency analysis.

From the Go FAQ:

Go provides a model for software construction that makes dependency analysis easy and avoids much of the overhead of C-style include files and libraries.

That is the main reason of fast compilation.

Igor Krivokon
+8  A: 

Compilation efficiency was a major design goal:

Finally, it is intended to be fast: it should take at most a few seconds to build a large executable on a single computer. To meet these goals required addressing a number of linguistic issues: an expressive but lightweight type system; concurrency and garbage collection; rigid dependency specification; and so on. FAQ

The language FAQ is pretty interesting in regards to specific language features relating to parsing:

Second, the language has been designed to be easy to analyze and can be parsed without a symbol table.

Larry OBrien
+5  A: 

Simply ( in my own words ), because the syntax is very easy ( to analyze and to parse )

For instance, no type inheritance means, not problematic analysis to find out if the new type follows the rules imposed by the base type.

For instance in this code example: "interfaces" the compiler doesn't go and check if the intended type implement the given interface while analyzing that type. Only until it's used ( and IF it is used ) the check is performed.

Other example, the compiler tells you if you're declaring a variable and not using it ( or if you are supposed to hold a return value and you're not )

The following doesn't compile:

package main
func main() {
    var a int 
    a = 0
}
notused.go:3: a declared and not used

This kinds of enforcements and principles make the resulting code safer, and the compiler doesn't have to perform extra validations that the programmer can do.

At large all these details make a language easier to parse which result in fast compilations.

Again, in my own words.

OscarRyz
+2  A: 

The basic idea of compilation is actually very simple. A recursive-descent parser, in principle, can run at I/O bound speed. Code generation is basically a very simple process. A symbol table and basic type system is not something that requires a lot of computation.

However, it is not hard to slow down a compiler.

If there is a preprocessor phase, with multi-level include directives, macro definitions, and conditional compilation, as useful as those things are, it is not hard to load it down. (For one example, I'm thinking of the Windows and MFC header files.) That is why precompiled headers are necessary.

In terms of optimizing the generated code, there is no limit to how much processing can be added to that phase.

Mike Dunlavey
+2  A: 

While most of the above is true, there is one very important point that was not really mentionend: Dependency management.

Go only needs to include the packages that you are importing directly (as those already imported what they need). This is in stark contrast to C/C++, where every single file starts including x headers, which include y headers etc. Bottom line: Go's compiling takes linear time w.r.t to the number of imported packages, where C/C++ take exponential time.

Kosta
+3  A: 

I think it's not that Go compilers are fast, it's that other compilers are slow.

C and C++ compilers have to parse enormous amounts of headers - for example, compiling C++ "hello world" requires compilation of 18k lines of code, which is almost half a megabyte of sources!:

$ cpp hello.cpp | wc
  18364   40513  433334

Java and C# compilers run in VM, which means before they can compile anything, operating system has to load whole VM, then they have to be JIT-compiled from bytecode to native code, all of which takes some time.

Speed of compilation depends on several factors.

Some languages are designed to be compiled fast. For example, Pascal was designed to be compiled using a single-pass compiler.

Compilers itself can be optimized too. For example, Turbo Pascal compiler was written in hand-optimized assembler, which, combined with language design, resulted in really fast compiler working on 286-class hardware. I think that even now, modern Pascal compilers (e.g. FreePascal) are faster than Go compilers.

el.pescado
+2  A: 

Go was designed to be fast, and it shows.

  1. Dependency Management: no header file, you just need to look at the packages that are directly imported (no need to worry about what they import) thus you have linear dependencies.
  2. Grammar: the grammar of the language is simple, thus easily parsed. Although the number of features is reduced, thus the compiler code itself is tight (few paths).
  3. No overload allowed: you see a symbol, you know which method it refers to.
  4. It's trivially possible to compile Go in parallel because each package can be compiled independently.

Note that GO isn't the only language with such features (modules are the norm in modern languages), but they did it well.

Matthieu M.