Asciidoc supports callouts. How can one write similar callouts using reStructuredText?
+1
A:
There does not seem to be a built-in equivalent, but it is easy to make something that looks similar to the example given in the asciidoc documentation:
.. topic:: MS-DOS directory listing
::
10/17/97 9:04 <DIR> bin
10/16/97 14:11 <DIR> DOS <1>
10/16/97 14:40 <DIR> Program Files
10/16/97 14:46 <DIR> TEMP
10/17/97 9:04 <DIR> tmp
10/16/97 14:37 <DIR> WINNT
10/16/97 14:25 119 AUTOEXEC.BAT <2>
2/13/94 6:21 54,619 COMMAND.COM <2>
10/16/97 14:25 115 CONFIG.SYS <2>
11/16/97 17:17 61,865,984 pagefile.sys
2/13/94 6:21 9,349 WINA20.386 <3>
1. This directory holds MS-DOS.
2. System startup code for DOS.
3. Some sort of Windows 3.1 hack.
The only thing this lacks is the highlights on the markers. If those are very important to you, you can use a parsed-literal
block:
.. topic:: MS-DOS directory listing
.. parsed-literal::
10/17/97 9:04 <DIR> bin
10/16/97 14:11 <DIR> DOS **<1>**
10/16/97 14:40 <DIR> Program Files
10/16/97 14:46 <DIR> TEMP
10/17/97 9:04 <DIR> tmp
10/16/97 14:37 <DIR> WINNT
10/16/97 14:25 119 AUTOEXEC.BAT **<2>**
2/13/94 6:21 54,619 COMMAND.COM **<2>**
10/16/97 14:25 115 CONFIG.SYS **<2>**
11/16/97 17:17 61,865,984 pagefile.sys
2/13/94 6:21 9,349 WINA20.386 **<3>**
1. This directory holds MS-DOS.
2. System startup code for DOS.
3. Some sort of Windows 3.1 hack.
Should you have very many of these callouts, then I suggest making a custom directive for them.
Martin Geisler
2009-06-28 15:25:51